A Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Age Estimation Methods Based on Panoramic Radiography of Developing Teeth

Abstract

Background and aims. Tooth development is widely used in determining age and state of maturity. Dental age is of high importance in forensic and pediatric dentistry and also orthodontic treatment planning .The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of four radiographic age estimation methods.Materials and methods. Orthopantomographic images of 537 healthy children (age: 3.9-14.5 years old) were evaluated. Dental age of the subjects was determined through Demirjian’s, Willem’s, Cameriere’s, and Smith’s methods. Differences and correlations between chronological and dental ages were assessed by paired t-tests and Pearson’s correlation analysis, respectively.Results. The mean chronological age of the subjects was 8.93 ± 2.04 years. Overestimations of age were observed following the use of Demirjian’s method (0.87 ± 1.00 years), Willem’s method (0.36 ± 0.87 years), and Smith’s method (0.06 ± 0.63 years). However, Cameriere’s method underestimated age by 0.19 ± 0.86 years. While paired t-tests revealed significant differences between the mean chronological age and ages determined by Demirjian’s, Willem’s, and Cameriere’s methods (P < 0.001), such a significant difference was absent between chronological age and dental age based on Smith’s method (P = 0.079). Pearson’s correlation analysis suggested linear correlations between chronological age and dental age determined by all four methods.Conclusion. Our findings indicated Smith’s method to have the highest accuracy among the four assessed methods. How-ever, all four methods can be used with acceptable accuracy.

Applicability of Willem’s Method of Dental Age Assessment in 14 Years Threshold Children in South India - A Pilot Study

“…Unlike the results of this pilot study, a study conducted in Iran concluded that Willem's method overestimated the age by 0.30 years in girls and 0.42 years in boys [27]. Similarly, Galić et al noted Willem's method to overestimate the age by 0.24 and 0.42 years, in girls and boys respectively [28].…”

Comparison of Cameriere’s and Demirjian’s Methods of Age Estimation among Children in Kerala: A Pilot Study

“…Paired t-test revealed significant difference between mean chronologic age and dental age. 8 In our study, the mean of difference of estimated age by Cameriere’s method was 1.08 and by Demirjian’s method was 2.0 years. Our study also indicated an underestimation of age by Cameriere’s method, while overestimation of age by Demirjian’s method was noted only in four patients.…”

Identifying missing people: the contribution of forensic dentistry and DNA

“…Another relevance of the radiological study is the use for the analysis of teeth with the purpose of determining the age of the deceased person, especially in the age group where dental development takes place, in the mineralization phase of the teeth 17 . This analysis allows determining the exact stage of development of the tooth germs, evidencing the rhizogenesis of the evaluated teeth.…”