Lymph Node Micrometastases are Associated with Worse Survival in Patients with Otherwise Node-Negative Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract

BackgroundLymph node metastases on routine histology are a strong negative predictor for survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Additional immunohistochemistry can detect lymph node micrometastases in patients who are otherwise node negative, but the prognostic value is unsure. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on survival of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastases in patients with node-negative (pN0) hilar cholangiocarcinoma on routine histology.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2010, a total of 146 patients underwent curative-intent resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with regional lymphadenectomy at two university medical centers in the Netherlands. Ninety-one patients (62 %) without lymph node metastases at routine histology were included. Micrometastases were identified by multiple sectioning of all lymph nodes and additional immunostaining with an antibody against cytokeratin 19 (K19). The association with overall survival was assessed in univariable and multivariable analysis. Median follow-up was 48 months.ResultsMicrometastases were identified in 16 (5 %) of 324 lymph nodes, corresponding to 11 (12 %) of 91 patients. There were no differences in clinical variables between K19 lymph node-positive and -negative patients. Five-year survival rates in patients with lymph node micrometastases were significantly lower compared to patients without micrometastases (27 vs. 54 %, P = 0.01). Multivariable analysis confirmed micrometastases as an independent prognostic factor for survival (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.4, P = 0.02).ConclusionsLymph node micrometastases are associated with worse survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical detection of lymph node micrometastases leads to better staging of patients who were initially diagnosed with node-negative (pN0) hilar cholangiocarcinoma on routine histology.

<p>Prognostic Nomogram That Predicts Overall Survival of Patients with Distal Cholangiocarcinoma After Pancreatoduodenectomy</p>

“…Moreover, lymph node micrometastasis, which may not be detected using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining, may correlate with shorter overall survival of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. 24,26 We show here that the degree of tumor differentiation was a major factor that influenced prognosis. Poorly differentiated tumor tissues are more invasive and therefore have a higher potential for metastasis; and poorly differentiated cholangiocarcinoma cells are more likely to metastasize.…”

Meta-analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma

“…Thirty‐one articles underwent initial qualitative assessment, of which seven were subsequently excluded, two owing to data duplication. The remaining five articles were excluded because of variable data reporting: one had trichotomized data, from which no meaningful data could be acquired; one did not report a primary series; one did not report prognostic variables for OS; one provided survival data only for patients with N0 disease; and one did not provide consistent numbers for overall survivors.…”

Prognostic significance of mucinous component in hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative‐intent resection

“…Several prognostic factors for RFS and OS after curative‐intent resection of HC have been reported, such as lymph node metastasis, portal vein invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margin . However, the prognostic factors of HCM were still entirely unknown.…”