2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1576-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between neighborhood economic hardship, the retail food environment, fast food intake, and obesity: findings from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin

Abstract: BackgroundNeighborhood-level characteristics such as economic hardship and the retail food environment are assumed to be correlated and to influence consumers’ dietary behavior and health status, but few studies have investigated these different relationships comprehensively in a single study. This work aims to investigate the association between neighborhood-level economic hardship, the retail food environment, fast food consumption, and obesity prevalence.MethodsLinking data from the population-based Survey … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…45 However, other studies did not confirm these findings. 40, 46 We found that living in areas with low access to healthy food was not associated with a higher CVD risk, inflammation, OS or arterial stiffness compared to subjects living in areas with good access to healthy food. Thus, food access by itself, measured by proximity to supermarkets, might not contribute to increased cardiovascular risk, and the relative cost of higher quality food rather than access may be a major barrier to healthy lifestyle and choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…45 However, other studies did not confirm these findings. 40, 46 We found that living in areas with low access to healthy food was not associated with a higher CVD risk, inflammation, OS or arterial stiffness compared to subjects living in areas with good access to healthy food. Thus, food access by itself, measured by proximity to supermarkets, might not contribute to increased cardiovascular risk, and the relative cost of higher quality food rather than access may be a major barrier to healthy lifestyle and choices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In terms of unhealthy food availability, many studies in the US have tended to find that unemployed and immigrant groups are more vulnerable and have easier access to less favourable food outlets such as fast food restaurants and convenience stores (see Pearce et al ; Powell et al ; Laxy et al ). Our results from Table are generally consistent with their outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first included the percentage of the population aged under 19 ( Children ) and the percentage of the senior population aged 65 and over ( Senior ) as the control variables since these households are more vulnerable to unhealthy food sources (Larsen and Gilliland ; Wang et al ; Su et al ; Li and Ashuri ). Many studies have considered the effect of the education level on food accessibility (Larsen and Gilliland ; Laxy et al ; Su et al ; Li and Ashuri ). We chose the percentage of residents who have a higher education such as post‐secondary certificate, diploma, or degree ( High Education ) as the education level indicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we found that 27% of our sample consumed fried food at least twice per week. Numerous adult studies have consistently found a link between fast food intake and obesity, [ 27 29 ] however, few studies have examined the relationship of fast food and/or fried foods on postpartum weight retention. In the Active Mothers Postpartum study, which included 450 overweight or obese White and African American postpartum women, lower junk food intake (which included French fries, fast food, chips, and soda and sugar sweetened beverages) at baseline (6 weeks postpartum) was linked to greater weight loss at 12-, 18, and 24-months postpartum [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%