2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Limb Evaluation and One-Year Follow Up of Non-Ambulant Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: An Observational Multicenter Trial

Abstract: Assessment of the upper limb strength in non-ambulant neuromuscular patients remains challenging. Although potential outcome measures have been reported, longitudinal data demonstrating sensitivity to clinical evolution in spinal muscular atrophy patients are critically lacking. Our study recruited 23 non-ambulant patients, 16 patients (males/females = 6/10; median age 15.4 years with a range from 10.7 to 31.1 years) with spinal muscular atrophy type II and 7 patients (males/females = 2/5; median age 19.9 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(47 reference statements)
5
72
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria were the following: inability to sit upright in a wheelchair for at least 1 hour, severe intellectual impairment preventing full understanding of tests, recent upper limb surgery or trauma, or known immunodeficiency. All patients underwent clinical and functional assessments every 6 months using the Motor Function Measure (MFM; http://www.motor-functionmeasure.org) and the MyoSet devices specifically developed and validated for weak patients 4,5,23 (MyoGrip and MyoPinch for hand grip and key pinch strength and MoviPlate for function). Patients were assessed by NMRS and NMRI annually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria were the following: inability to sit upright in a wheelchair for at least 1 hour, severe intellectual impairment preventing full understanding of tests, recent upper limb surgery or trauma, or known immunodeficiency. All patients underwent clinical and functional assessments every 6 months using the Motor Function Measure (MFM; http://www.motor-functionmeasure.org) and the MyoSet devices specifically developed and validated for weak patients 4,5,23 (MyoGrip and MyoPinch for hand grip and key pinch strength and MoviPlate for function). Patients were assessed by NMRS and NMRI annually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is an additional functional score that is applicable for patients who are independently ambulant. This test can measure exercise capacity and is sensitive to fatigue related changes in SMA [810]. Functional tests for infants with SMA include the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam part 2 (HINE-2) and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) [8].…”
Section: Clinical Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can be subdivided in 5 categories: MMT, hand-held dynamometry (HHD), fixed dynamometry (generally referred to as quantitative muscle testing or “QMT”), isokinetic dynamometry (such as with a Biodex) and specific dynamometry (à la carte designed devices). He illustrated the correlations obtained between MMT, QMT and Biodex measurements in healthy subjects, Duchenne dystrophy or spinal muscular atrophy patients [41,42]. He illustrated the relationship between strength and motor abilities (evaluated by functional tests such as the 6 minute walking distance (6MWD)), leading to ceiling effects (increasing strength on QMT with a constant distance traveled on the 6MWD) or floor effects (undetectable observed effect such as for patients incapable of walking who achieve a 6MWD of 0, despite a measurable generated force on QMT).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Muscle Weakness In Patients With Iimmentioning
confidence: 99%