Fibroblast growth factor 23 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial
Abstract:IntroductionCardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Biomarkers might help in risk stratification and understanding of pathophysiology. Preliminary data suggests that patients with CS face a profound increase in the osteocyte-derived hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), which acts as a negative regulator of serum phosphate levels. The present study aimed to assess the predictive role of FGF-23 for clinical outcome in a large … Show more
“…Our results could confirm this previous observation by showing a relative low FGF-23 concentration in haemodynamically stable patients with STEMI, especially as compared with the previously published FGF-23 values in CS 6 22. It was hypothesised that this tremendous increase of FGF-23 in CS is mainly caused by the neuroendocrinological and haemodynamic alterations, not by the myocardial ischaemia per se 22. Indeed, we could not find any significant correlation between CMR-determined myocardial or microvascular damage and FGF-23 concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the study by Pöss et al ,6 uncomplicated patients with AMI did not show significantly higher FGF-23 levels than patients with stable CAD, however hampered by the very small number of patients with AMI (n=18). Our results could confirm this previous observation by showing a relative low FGF-23 concentration in haemodynamically stable patients with STEMI, especially as compared with the previously published FGF-23 values in CS 6 22. It was hypothesised that this tremendous increase of FGF-23 in CS is mainly caused by the neuroendocrinological and haemodynamic alterations, not by the myocardial ischaemia per se 22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Pöss et al 6 studied 51 patients with CS and revealed a tremendous increase of FGF-23 levels in CS, which was associated with worse outcome. More recently, the larger study by Fuernau et al 22 including 182 patients with CS approved the association between FGF-23 and poor outcome. However, the prognostic significance of FGF-23 in haemodynamically stable patients, representing the vast majority of patients with AMI, has never been investigated so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) were investigated in previous studies 6 22. Pöss et al 6 studied 51 patients with CS and revealed a tremendous increase of FGF-23 levels in CS, which was associated with worse outcome.…”
Circulating FGF-23 is independently associated with LV remodelling after reperfused STEMI. A comprehensive multimarker strategy that includes FGF-23 provides incremental prognostic value for prediction of LV remodelling.
“…Our results could confirm this previous observation by showing a relative low FGF-23 concentration in haemodynamically stable patients with STEMI, especially as compared with the previously published FGF-23 values in CS 6 22. It was hypothesised that this tremendous increase of FGF-23 in CS is mainly caused by the neuroendocrinological and haemodynamic alterations, not by the myocardial ischaemia per se 22. Indeed, we could not find any significant correlation between CMR-determined myocardial or microvascular damage and FGF-23 concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the study by Pöss et al ,6 uncomplicated patients with AMI did not show significantly higher FGF-23 levels than patients with stable CAD, however hampered by the very small number of patients with AMI (n=18). Our results could confirm this previous observation by showing a relative low FGF-23 concentration in haemodynamically stable patients with STEMI, especially as compared with the previously published FGF-23 values in CS 6 22. It was hypothesised that this tremendous increase of FGF-23 in CS is mainly caused by the neuroendocrinological and haemodynamic alterations, not by the myocardial ischaemia per se 22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Pöss et al 6 studied 51 patients with CS and revealed a tremendous increase of FGF-23 levels in CS, which was associated with worse outcome. More recently, the larger study by Fuernau et al 22 including 182 patients with CS approved the association between FGF-23 and poor outcome. However, the prognostic significance of FGF-23 in haemodynamically stable patients, representing the vast majority of patients with AMI, has never been investigated so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) were investigated in previous studies 6 22. Pöss et al 6 studied 51 patients with CS and revealed a tremendous increase of FGF-23 levels in CS, which was associated with worse outcome.…”
Circulating FGF-23 is independently associated with LV remodelling after reperfused STEMI. A comprehensive multimarker strategy that includes FGF-23 provides incremental prognostic value for prediction of LV remodelling.
“…FGF23 may reflect prevalent cardiovascular disease [2]. This concern has been founded upon the observation that hypertrophic and failing [20,23,28] hearts may directly produce FGF23, that particularly high FGF23 levels are found in patients with severe acute heart disease [38,39], and that patients chronically exposed to high FGF23 -such as patients with hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia -do not regularly develop heart disease [40]. Experimentally, a direct role of FGF23 in the development of vascular calcification has largely been ruled out [41], and data on its contribution to left ventricular hypertrophy remains uncertain: even though several reports have suggested FGF23 to activate cardiomyocytes and induce their proliferation [8,9], later studies have questioned these findings [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Background: Various epidemiological studies linked high fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels with cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease (CKD). It remains enigmatic whether high FGF23 exerts adverse cardiovascular effects, or whether it reflects detrimental effects of residual confounders. Earlier studies adjusted for CKD-mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD) regulators of FGF23 rather than for recently discovered non-CKD-MBD regulators, among which iron deficiency and heart failure are of particular importance. Moreover, they used c-terminal FGF23 (cFGF23) assays rather than more specific intact FGF23 (iFGF23) assays. Methods: The CARE FOR HOMe study analyzed plasma ferritin, iFGF23, cFGF23 and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) along with conventional risk factors, among 575 CKD G2-G4 patients to determine the interaction between FGF23, its non-CKD-MBD regulators, and incident cardiovascular events in CKD patients. The participants were followed up for 5.1 ± 2.1 years for the occurrence of atherosclerotic events and hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure. Results: cFGF23 correlated strongly with high iFGF23 (r = 0.607), fairly with high NT-proBNP (r = 0.453) and weakly with low ferritin (r = –0.207); correlation coefficients of iFGF23 with NT-proBNP and ferritin were numerically lower. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, both endpoints were predicted by cFGF23 and iFGF23. In Cox regression models, cFGF23 remained an outcome predictor after adjustment for conventional risk factors and ferritin. This prediction was largely eliminated when further adjusting for NT-proBNP. iFGF23 was less consistently associated with adverse outcome in partly adjusted models, and failed to predict outcome in fully adjusted models. Conclusion: In summary, iron deficiency and heart failure affect plasma FGF23. As adjustment for NT-proBNP virtually eliminates the association between plasma FGF23 and predefined outcome, we speculate that high FGF23, rather than exerting detrimental cardiovascular effects, mirrors prevalent heart disease.
Background
The outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction has not appreciably changed in the last 30 years despite the development of various percutaneous mechanical circulatory support options. It is clear that there are varying degrees of cardiogenic shock but there is no robust classification scheme to categorize this disease state.
Methods
A multidisciplinary group of experts convened by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions was assembled to derive a proposed classification schema for cardiogenic shock. Representatives from cardiology (interventional, advanced heart failure, noninvasive), emergency medicine, critical care, and cardiac nursing all collaborated to develop the proposed schema.
Results
A system describing stages of cardiogenic shock from A to E was developed. Stage A is “at risk” for cardiogenic shock, stage B is “beginning” shock, stage C is “classic” cardiogenic shock, stage D is “deteriorating”, and E is “extremis”. The difference between stages B and C is the presence of hypoperfusion which is present in stages C and higher. Stage D implies that the initial set of interventions chosen have not restored stability and adequate perfusion despite at least 30 minutes of observation and stage E is the patient in extremis, highly unstable, often with cardiovascular collapse.
Conclusion
This proposed classification system is simple, clinically applicable across the care spectrum from pre‐hospital providers to intensive care staff but will require future validation studies to assess its utility and potential prognostic implications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.