2014
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of CRB-65 as a prognostic tool in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Abstract: BackgroundPatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) often require hospitalisation. CRB-65 is a simple and useful scoring system to predict mortality. However, prognostic factors such as underlying disease and blood oxygenation are not included despite their potential to increase the performance of CRB-65.MethodsThe study included 1172 consecutive patients (830 inpatients, 342 outpatients) with CAP. Mortality, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, and the area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictive value of the CRB‐65 score, however, is not optimal . Hence, there have been continuous efforts to improve the CRB‐65 score by adding easily obtainable parameters such as the presence of chronic co‐morbidities or oxygenation assessment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predictive value of the CRB‐65 score, however, is not optimal . Hence, there have been continuous efforts to improve the CRB‐65 score by adding easily obtainable parameters such as the presence of chronic co‐morbidities or oxygenation assessment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Hence, there have been continuous efforts to improve the CRB-65 score by adding easily obtainable parameters such as the presence of chronic co-morbidities or oxygenation assessment. [9][10][11] In recent years, several studies have recognized the prognostic importance of functional status (FS) in elderly patients. [12][13][14][15] Moreover, severely limited premorbid FS was associated with mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with severe pneumonia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRB-65kriteriene er vist å vaere bedre enn SIRS til å identifisere pasienter med pneumoni med lav mortalitet som kan behandles utenfor sykehus. Det diskuteres imidlertid om pasienter med lav CRB-65-skår, men høy grad av komorbiditet eller hypoksemi, bør vurderes innlagt, og om CRB-65-kriteriene derfor ikke er optimale for å vurdere alvorlighetsgrad og prognose (12,13). Andre studier har sammenlignet CRB-65-kriteriene med SIRS i tillegg til de nye sepsiskriteriene, quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) (14).…”
Section: Diskusjonunclassified
“…Based on recent studies, improvement of the CRB‐65 score by the addition of two easily obtainable parameters such as the presence of chronic comorbidities and oxygenation assessment has been suggested . Thus, a ‘D’‐criterion (diseases: 1 point for the presence of a defined extra‐pulmonary comorbidity) and an ‘S’‐criterion (saturation of oxygen: 1 point for oxygen saturation < 90%) have been added to the CRB‐65 criteria . The resulting DS‐CRB‐65 score may combine the advantages of providing a superior NPV for poor outcomes together with easy accessibility, as no additional laboratory measurements are needed and implementation in an ambulatory setting seems feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%