2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective processing in positive schizotypy: Loose control of social-emotional information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study showed that an individual’s typical use of bright (“laughing-with”) and dark (“laughing-at”) humour is linked to the brain’s automatic responses to incoming social-emotional information. Greater typical use of benevolent humour, the goals and intentions of which are in keeping with the characteristics of “laughing-with” humour, was associated with greater relative decreases of prefrontal-posterior coupling during the processing of other people’s happy laughter, allowing the brain to become more affected by this apparently rewarding social-emotional signal 24 25 26 27 28 29 . Greater typical use of the three humour styles that were consistent with malicious intentions of “laughing-at” humour (cynicism, sarcasm, irony 17 ) was associated with greater relative decreases of prefrontal-posterior coupling (i.e., a wider opened perceptual gate) during the processing of other people’s crying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study showed that an individual’s typical use of bright (“laughing-with”) and dark (“laughing-at”) humour is linked to the brain’s automatic responses to incoming social-emotional information. Greater typical use of benevolent humour, the goals and intentions of which are in keeping with the characteristics of “laughing-with” humour, was associated with greater relative decreases of prefrontal-posterior coupling during the processing of other people’s happy laughter, allowing the brain to become more affected by this apparently rewarding social-emotional signal 24 25 26 27 28 29 . Greater typical use of the three humour styles that were consistent with malicious intentions of “laughing-at” humour (cynicism, sarcasm, irony 17 ) was associated with greater relative decreases of prefrontal-posterior coupling (i.e., a wider opened perceptual gate) during the processing of other people’s crying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The clips were matched for peak sound intensity and sound level range, and were presented over headphones. They have been used in several previous studies 25 26 27 28 29 . The displayed emotions are unambiguous and intense; healthy participants have no difficulties identifying and differentiating the expressed affective states 25 29 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experimental paradigm, we consider the interaction of changes in emotional stimuli and neural responses thereto as potential correlates of self-regulation. Decreases in beta frequency band prefrontal-posterior EEG coherence induced by emotional stimulation reflect a loosening of the prefrontal cortex's regulatory control of parietal regions 9,[11][12][13][14][15] . Therefore, beta coherence plays a critical role in brain networks responding to emotion-cognition interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in an electroencephalogram (EEG) study, individuals with schizotypy showed impaired processing for social-emotional information. These individuals showed less prefrontal-posterior functional coupling than controls, which is considered to be indicative of a mechanism to protect the individual from becoming overwhelmed by the perception of social-emotion information, during exposure to auditory displays of strong emotion (Papousek et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%