This paper reviews changes in the research literature on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) since our earlier review (Stith, Rosen, & McCollum, 2003 This paper reviews changes in the research literature on Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) since our earlier review (Stith, Rosen, & McCollum, 2003). A number of changes have occurred in the way we view IPV as well as in our knowledge about existing and developing treatment approaches. In this manuscript we describe the research that has led to these changes, as we seek to understand and deal with what remains a serious and costly social problem. Since there is a very limited amount of research on violence in same sex relationships, and no research on the effectiveness of treatment approaches for same sex couples, the research that is reviewed here is reflective of that limitation.
An Evolving Understanding of IPVAs a result of research in the field, our understanding of IPV is beginning to broaden and change. Traditionally, IPV has been seen through a feminist paradigm and understood to be the expression of men's power over women, occurring in intimate heterosexual relationships, and supported by a patriarchal culture. Violence was considered a male phenomenon with women either remaining solely victims or assaulting their male partners in self defense. Violence was also seen as the primary problem with co-existing issues often seen as distractions that helped men evade responsibility for their violence. The responsibility for violence was unilaterally men's while the costs were unilaterally women's and the focus of intervention was to end violence specifically against women.Evidence for this view of IPV came from studies using criminal justice and shelterseeking populations and showed considerable gender-asymmetry (i.e. many more men than women are arrested and many more women than men seek shelter in domestic violence victim Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence 4 shelters). However, this view was challenged as research using community samples began to be conducted. Although research examining arrested offenders or victims seeking shelter continues to show dramatic gender-asymmetry, community-based studies find that IPV perpetration and victimization may be more gender-symmetrical than we previously thought with participants reporting male perpetrated, female perpetrated, and reciprocally perpetrated violence. Whitaker, Haileyesus, Swahm and Saltzman (2007), for instance, analyzed data on 11,370 US adults aged 18 to 28 from the 2001 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and found almost 24% of all relationships had some violence. Interestingly, this study found that half of those relationships were reciprocally violent; that is, both partners assaulted each other. Furthermore, in those relationships where the violence was unilateral, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Methods used to assess violence, including sampling strategies, influence prevalence rates, yet, it is also becoming clearer that both men and women perpetrate ...