2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0037617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External distraction impairs categorization performance in older adults.

Abstract: The detrimental influence of distraction on memory and attention is well established, yet it is not as clear if irrelevant information impacts categorization abilities and if this impact changes in aging. We examined categorization with morphed prototype stimuli in both younger and older adults, using an adaptive staircase approach to assess participants' performance in conditions with and without visual distractors. Results showed that distraction did not affect younger adults, but produced a negative impact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that this result was only present in OA on the most difficult conditions, we suspect this is most likely reflective of a practice effect. This finding is supported by previous work demonstrating heightened practice effects in OAs compared with younger populations (Wais & Gazzaley, 2014; McCarley, Yamani, Kramer, & Mounts, 2012; Becic, Boot, & Kramer, 2008). Importantly, there were no observed training-related basic motoric speed changes from pretraining to posttraining for any of the participants, suggesting that the observed effects were not due to a generalized augmented motoric speed but rather are indicative of training-based plasticity changes in the attention system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Given that this result was only present in OA on the most difficult conditions, we suspect this is most likely reflective of a practice effect. This finding is supported by previous work demonstrating heightened practice effects in OAs compared with younger populations (Wais & Gazzaley, 2014; McCarley, Yamani, Kramer, & Mounts, 2012; Becic, Boot, & Kramer, 2008). Importantly, there were no observed training-related basic motoric speed changes from pretraining to posttraining for any of the participants, suggesting that the observed effects were not due to a generalized augmented motoric speed but rather are indicative of training-based plasticity changes in the attention system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The discussion has also highlighted the fact that for older users there are a number of factors that affect their attention which do not seem to affect that of younger adults. The feeling was that younger adults had a greater capacity to deal with distraction (Wais & Gazzaley, 2014) that would appear to link in to the concept of inhibitory processing found in psychology literature (Guerreiro, Murphy, & Van Gerven, 2010). Related to this is that younger adults seemed to have better visual attention in general with wider fields of view whereas for older adults, visual decline and challenges wearing varifocal lenses were reported; factors which were noted as particularly problematic when shifting focus.…”
Section: Topic Areasmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One possible explanation is that the limiting factor for orientation discrimination with a matching-to-sample task is not only perceptual processing but also a top-down control of VWM. Compared to younger adults, older adults may be more restricted in their abilities to exploit VWM using top-down control of perceptual processing (Wais & Gazzaley, 2014), but that training allows them to better utilize top-down control of attention (Lien, Ruthruff, & Kuhns, 2008; Madden, 2007). Another possibility is that both cognitive/inhibitory control (Braver, 2012) and training-based facilitation were delayed for older adults relative to younger adults—thereby allowing older adults to show the full potential of the facilitation at the longer (VWM) ISI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%