2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Diagnostic Value of a Novel Noninvasive Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Method Versus Standard Coronary Angiography for Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, imaging artifacts such as blooming caused by large coronary calcifications, stents, and cardiac motion may compromise the accuracy of F F R CT (Koo, 2014). Itu et al (2012) presented a technique to estimate FFR in the coronary artery tree using a CCTA scan by simulating blood flow, which was later evaluated by Renker et al (2014) and Coenen et al (2015). The method uses a patient-specific parametric lumped heart model, while modeling the hemodynamics in both healthy and stenotic vessel tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, imaging artifacts such as blooming caused by large coronary calcifications, stents, and cardiac motion may compromise the accuracy of F F R CT (Koo, 2014). Itu et al (2012) presented a technique to estimate FFR in the coronary artery tree using a CCTA scan by simulating blood flow, which was later evaluated by Renker et al (2014) and Coenen et al (2015). The method uses a patient-specific parametric lumped heart model, while modeling the hemodynamics in both healthy and stenotic vessel tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, technological innovation allows to calculate coronary flow and pressure based on anatomic MDCT image data without hyperemia, thereby measuring FFR noninvasively (35,36). Several studies demonstrated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of FFR evaluation on MDCT (FFR CT ) (37)(38)(39)(40)(41). Recent multicenter international study investigated the ability of FFR CT for diagnosis of ischemia compared to an invasive FFR measurement in 252 stable patients with suspected or known CAD (37).…”
Section: Fractional Flow Reserve (Ffr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, FFRCT may be useful for identifying patients who may benefit from revascularization and for prediction and optimization of PCI outcomes. [32][33][34] …”
Section: Accuracy Of Ffrctmentioning
confidence: 99%