2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete images of the sugar content in sugar-sweetened beverages reduces attraction to and selection of these beverages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Text-based labels can improve understanding of the health harms associated with SSBs overconsumption and may reduce the selection of such drinks ( Bollard et al, 2016 ; Gray et al, 2011 ; Vanepps and Roberto, 2016 ), including by parents choosing beverages for their children ( Roberto et al, 2016 ). Consistent with prior research on the use of warning labels on tobacco products, image-based labels on SSBs, including labels that illustrate the health consequences of excess sugar consumption ( Bollard et al, 2016 ) and those illustrating sugar content ( Adams et al, 2014 ), appear superior than text-based labels, having been shown more effective at reducing intentions to purchase SSBs and preferences for SSBs ( Bollard et al, 2016 ; Adams et al, 2014 ). Further research, however, is needed to elucidate the types of images that could be most effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Text-based labels can improve understanding of the health harms associated with SSBs overconsumption and may reduce the selection of such drinks ( Bollard et al, 2016 ; Gray et al, 2011 ; Vanepps and Roberto, 2016 ), including by parents choosing beverages for their children ( Roberto et al, 2016 ). Consistent with prior research on the use of warning labels on tobacco products, image-based labels on SSBs, including labels that illustrate the health consequences of excess sugar consumption ( Bollard et al, 2016 ) and those illustrating sugar content ( Adams et al, 2014 ), appear superior than text-based labels, having been shown more effective at reducing intentions to purchase SSBs and preferences for SSBs ( Bollard et al, 2016 ; Adams et al, 2014 ). Further research, however, is needed to elucidate the types of images that could be most effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Qualitative research has shown that people have difficulty understanding and interpreting energy information [36], despite having ready access to this information via on-pack nutrition information panels. Furthermore, experimental research has shown that concrete visual images of sugar are better understood than abstract information [54]. Large proportions of respondents in this study underestimated, rather than overestimated the sugar content and exercise equivalent metric, which has important implications for consumers' decision-making processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The remaining five experimental studies (Adams, Hart, Gilmer, Lloyd-Richardson, & Burton, 2014;Bialkova, Sasse, & Fenko, 2016;Kim, Lopetcharat, & Drake, 2013;Roberto et al, 2016;Sutterlin & Siegrist, 2015) explored whether products with sugar labels influence attitudes towards sugar. These studies had mixed results with three (Adams et al, 2014;Bialkova et al, 2016;Roberto et al, 2016) reporting positive effects of sugar labels on attitudes towards reduced SSB consumption, while the other two (Kim et al, 2013;Sutterlin & Siegrist, 2015) did not find such effects. The presence of a 'less than 30% sugar' label; a health-warning label ('drinking beverages with added sugar[s] contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay'); and a pictorial image of quantity of sugar in SSBs, all generated positive attitudes to reduce purchase intention and consumption of SSBs.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%