Abstract:Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and gene loss are key processes in bacterial evolution. However, the role of gene gain and loss in the emergence and maintenance of ecologically differentiated bacterial populations remains an open question. Here, we use whole-genome sequence data to quantify gene gain and loss for 27 lineages of the plant-associated bacterium Pseudomonas syringae. We apply an extensive error-control procedure that accounts for errors in draft genome data and greatly improves the accuracy of patt… Show more
“…In most studies this is apparent from a decrease in the rate of gene content change relative to the rate of nucleotide substitution in the deeper branches of the phylogeny compared to the tips. The same pattern is most elegantly demonstrated in the P. syringae and E. coli studies [21,22] in which the vast majority of individual gene gains are mapped to a single strain. There are three potential explanations for why most gene content changes are transient.…”
Section: Quantifying the Rate And Fate Of Changes In Gene Contentmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar estimates were found in Streptococcus [19] and Corynebacterium [20] genomes using the same methodology. A recent estimate of LGT rate in Pseudomonas syringae based on stochastic mapping methodology (after corrections necessary for working with genomes that are not sequenced to complete closure) was found to be four orders of magnitude higher than the estimate for B. cereus [21]. Individual P. syringae lineages could be shown to have acquired thousands of genes in the same period in which a 1% amino acid divergence accrued in the core genome.…”
Section: Quantifying the Rate And Fate Of Changes In Gene Contentmentioning
Lateral gene transfer is of fundamental importance to the evolution of prokaryote genomes and has important practical consequences, as evidenced by the rapid dissemination of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants. Relatively little effort has so far been devoted to explicitly quantifying the rate at which accessory genes are taken up and lost, but it is possible that the combined rate of lateral gene transfer and gene loss is higher than that of point mutation. What evolutionary forces underlie the rate of lateral gene transfer are not well understood. We here use theory developed to explain the evolution of mutation rates to address this question and explore its consequences for the study of prokaryote evolution.
“…In most studies this is apparent from a decrease in the rate of gene content change relative to the rate of nucleotide substitution in the deeper branches of the phylogeny compared to the tips. The same pattern is most elegantly demonstrated in the P. syringae and E. coli studies [21,22] in which the vast majority of individual gene gains are mapped to a single strain. There are three potential explanations for why most gene content changes are transient.…”
Section: Quantifying the Rate And Fate Of Changes In Gene Contentmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar estimates were found in Streptococcus [19] and Corynebacterium [20] genomes using the same methodology. A recent estimate of LGT rate in Pseudomonas syringae based on stochastic mapping methodology (after corrections necessary for working with genomes that are not sequenced to complete closure) was found to be four orders of magnitude higher than the estimate for B. cereus [21]. Individual P. syringae lineages could be shown to have acquired thousands of genes in the same period in which a 1% amino acid divergence accrued in the core genome.…”
Section: Quantifying the Rate And Fate Of Changes In Gene Contentmentioning
Lateral gene transfer is of fundamental importance to the evolution of prokaryote genomes and has important practical consequences, as evidenced by the rapid dissemination of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants. Relatively little effort has so far been devoted to explicitly quantifying the rate at which accessory genes are taken up and lost, but it is possible that the combined rate of lateral gene transfer and gene loss is higher than that of point mutation. What evolutionary forces underlie the rate of lateral gene transfer are not well understood. We here use theory developed to explain the evolution of mutation rates to address this question and explore its consequences for the study of prokaryote evolution.
“…[49] In addition, genes that are gained seem to be labile through evolutionary time, and are readily lost, while mutations tracing vertical phylogenetic signal continue to accumulate in the core genome. [50] Recent analyses of HGT across genomes suggest that long term successful transfer of genes across lineages is rare, [49] leaving phylogenetic structure intact. [51] These results are consistent with the observation that bacteria do form biologically coherent groups, which would not be expected if horizontal gene flow were rampant and unconstrained.…”
Phylogenetic trees are a crucial backbone for a wide breadth of biological research spanning systematics, organismal biology, ecology, and medicine. In 2015, the Open Tree of Life project published a first draft of a comprehensive tree of life, summarizing digitally available taxonomic and phylogenetic knowledge. This paper reviews, investigates, and addresses the following questions as a follow‐up to that paper, from the perspective of researchers involved in building this summary of the tree of life: Is there a tree of life and should we reconstruct it? Is available data sufficient to reconstruct the tree of life? Do we have access to phylogenetic inferences in usable form? Can we combine different phylogenetic estimates across the tree of life? And finally, what is the future of understanding the tree of life?
“…Likewise, it has been shown that new gene copies arise more often through LGT than through duplication (Treangen & Rocha 2011), and population genomic studies have revealed that isolates with nearly 5 identical nucleotide composition in the genes they share can differ by many hundreds of accessory genes (e.g. (Nowell et al 2014)), indicating that LGT might be more important than mutation. Indeed, over large evolutionary timescales LGT events can completely transform the genomic make-up, metabolism and ecological life-styles of bacterial lineages (e.g.…”
Although their diversity greatly exceeds that of plants and animals, microbial organisms have historically received less attention in ecology and evolutionary biology research. This knowledge gap is rapidly closing, owing to recent technological advances and an increasing appreciation for the role microbes play in shaping ecosystems and human health. In this review, we examine when and how the process and patterns of bacterial adaptation might fundamentally differ from those of macrobes, highlight methods used to measure adaptation in natural microbial populations, and discuss the importance of examining bacterial adaptation across multiple scales. We emphasize the need to consider the scales of adaptation as continua, in which the genetic makeup of bacteria blur boundaries between populations, species, and communities and with them concepts of ecological and evolutionary time. Finally, we examine current directions of the field as we move beyond the stamp-collecting phase and toward a better understanding of microbial adaptation in nature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.