2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.00a542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to assess light trapping structures versus a Lambertian Scatterer for solar cells?

Abstract: We propose a new figure of merit to assess the performance of light trapping nanostructures for solar cells, which we call the light trapping efficiency (LTE). The LTE has a target value of unity to represent the performance of an ideal Lambertian scatterer, although this is not an absolute limit but rather a benchmark value. Since the LTE aims to assess the nanostructure itself, it is, in principle, independent of the material, fabrication method or technology used. We use the LTE to compare numerous proposal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted that the LTE of experimental cells is significantly lower than that of theoretical structures, which can approach the Lambertian limit, LTE=1. The present nanophotonic cell, and that of [14], present a clear improvement compared to the reported results of [37], by advancing from 0.2-0.3 to 0.56 and 0.57 respectively. We further focus on the lowly-absorbed photons and evaluate the light-path enhancement factor of the nanophotonic cells following the same method as in [14].…”
supporting
confidence: 38%
“…They noted that the LTE of experimental cells is significantly lower than that of theoretical structures, which can approach the Lambertian limit, LTE=1. The present nanophotonic cell, and that of [14], present a clear improvement compared to the reported results of [37], by advancing from 0.2-0.3 to 0.56 and 0.57 respectively. We further focus on the lowly-absorbed photons and evaluate the light-path enhancement factor of the nanophotonic cells following the same method as in [14].…”
supporting
confidence: 38%
“…To conclude, we note that the differences between the curves corresponding to light trapping and the single-pass case are larger for thicknesses ranging from a few hundreds of nm to a few microns [51], where there is a crossover between Ray and Wave Optics. This range of thickness is thus the most interesting one for investigating the light trapping properties of photonic patterns.…”
Section: Light Trapping With Lambertian Scatterermentioning
confidence: 81%
“…An alternative definition of the so-called light-trapping efficiency, based on the J SC enhancement, is described and calculated for relevant lighttrapping structures in Ref. 11. Both the J SC and EQE are sensitive to the cell electronic quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%