2014
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of thin-section CT findings between seasonal influenza virus pneumonia andStreptococcus pneumoniaepneumonia

Abstract: (1) Distinguishing seasonal influenza virus pneumonia with S. pneumoniae pneumonia is important. (2) The CT findings of GGA and crazy-paving appearance were more frequently found in patients with influenza virus pneumonia than in patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia, whereas consolidation, mucoid impaction, centrilobular nodules and pleural effusion were more frequently found in patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no strong association between the radiographic patterns and the causative agents, 29,30 consolidation is more frequently observed in pneumococcal pneumonia. 31 Accordingly, the lowest rates of consolidation were observed in the PV and BV groups in this study, suggesting that pneumococcal vaccination may have had some preventive effect for pneumococcal pneumonia, or may have resulted in milder forms of radiographic presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Although there is no strong association between the radiographic patterns and the causative agents, 29,30 consolidation is more frequently observed in pneumococcal pneumonia. 31 Accordingly, the lowest rates of consolidation were observed in the PV and BV groups in this study, suggesting that pneumococcal vaccination may have had some preventive effect for pneumococcal pneumonia, or may have resulted in milder forms of radiographic presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Third, although infection is considered the most common cause of consolidation in the acute setting, 29 and >90% of subjects who develop consolidation have either bacterial or viral pneumonia, 30 it has been demonstrated that in certain cases and with certain organisms, ground glass opacities and nodules may be present. 31 , 32 Thus, our proposed CRP cutoff point may be most useful in discriminating pulmonary infections associated with consolidations on CT scans and may not apply for infections that induce nodularity or ground glass opacities as the predominant pattern. Fourth, arterial blood gases were not routinely collected in this study, and thus the contribution of hypoxemia to the elevation of NT-proBNP concentrations could not explored.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spn infection almost always follows a viral upper respiratory infection (URI). Therefore animal co-infection models have been used to study co-pathogenesis of Spn with viruses such as human influenza virus, [42][43][44][45][46][47] respiratory syncytial virus, 48 adenovirus, 49,50 metapneumovirus, 51 parainfluenza virus. 52 The most well-investigated bacterialviral interaction is the synergism between influenza virus and Spn 23 and the interaction has been shown to be strongly associated with Spn dissemination from the NP and subsequent local or systemic invasion.…”
Section: Host Inflammatory and Bacterial Virulence Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%