2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in in situ hybridisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was replaced by fluorescence-based techniques (FISH) when fluorescent dyes became available (Langer et al, 1981). FISH has been improved significantly in the past decades, providing high efficiency, sensitivity, and spatial resolution (Jiang and Gill, 2006;Volpi and Bridger, 2008;Cassidy and Jones, 2014), and is now used extensively in both biology research and clinical diagnostics.…”
Section: Commentary Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was replaced by fluorescence-based techniques (FISH) when fluorescent dyes became available (Langer et al, 1981). FISH has been improved significantly in the past decades, providing high efficiency, sensitivity, and spatial resolution (Jiang and Gill, 2006;Volpi and Bridger, 2008;Cassidy and Jones, 2014), and is now used extensively in both biology research and clinical diagnostics.…”
Section: Commentary Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stains are typically performed on the same automated platforms on which IHC is done. Instead of an antigen-antibody design, ISH entails the use of chromogen-tagged nucleic acids complementary to target DNA or RNA sequences [ 7 ]. Like IHC, ISH permits the identifi cation of target sequences in a tissuespecifi c context.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its ability to provide a detailed spatial analysis of gene expression and chromosomes at the single cell level, to identify the cell type, and to detect presence of viral genomes in the analyzed sample has led to its extensive use in a wide range of applications. 1,[3][4][5][6][7] FISH reactions are typically performed using a bench-top assay by pipetting the FISH hybridization mix onto the cytological sample, in which the transport of probes into the cell is primarily diffusion-based and hence is slow. 1,8 This leads to typical incubation times of up to 16 hours for low copy number targets 3,9 and 48 to 94 hours for entire genome hybridization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[3][4][5][6][7] FISH reactions are typically performed using a bench-top assay by pipetting the FISH hybridization mix onto the cytological sample, in which the transport of probes into the cell is primarily diffusion-based and hence is slow. 1,8 This leads to typical incubation times of up to 16 hours for low copy number targets 3,9 and 48 to 94 hours for entire genome hybridization. 4 Once hybridization is complete, FISH signals are analyzed using an end-point analysis after a stringent wash of the hybridization buffer containing the fluorescent probes from the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%