2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Monitoring of Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Kinetics

Abstract: We present a novel method for real-time monitoring and kinetic analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We implement the method using a vertical microfluidic probe containing a microstructure designed for rapid switching between probe solution and nonfluorescent imaging buffer. The FISH signal is monitored in real time during the imaging buffer wash, during which signal associated with unbound probes is removed. We provide a theoretical description of the method as well as a demonstration of its … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while most of these parameters can be optimized by controlling external conditions, reagent delivery is achieved locally on-chip and is particularly sensitive. For example, delays in bringing the smFISH probe into and out of contact with the embryo can lead to lower probe concentration or overexposure resulting in lower smFISH signal, uneven staining, and high background fluorescence. , Reagent exchange is challenging because it requires delivering chemicals to the embryo without losing the embryo in the process. To solve this problem, we added two design considerations to address sample loss from the trap entrance or the back-channel.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while most of these parameters can be optimized by controlling external conditions, reagent delivery is achieved locally on-chip and is particularly sensitive. For example, delays in bringing the smFISH probe into and out of contact with the embryo can lead to lower probe concentration or overexposure resulting in lower smFISH signal, uneven staining, and high background fluorescence. , Reagent exchange is challenging because it requires delivering chemicals to the embryo without losing the embryo in the process. To solve this problem, we added two design considerations to address sample loss from the trap entrance or the back-channel.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional control of the confinement size and shape can be achieved through different channel geometries, for example the use of two aspiration channels or a coaxial channel configuration to achieve symmetric or circular confinements. Multiple injection and aspiration channels could also be considered in the future to create more complex confinement geometries, such as quadrupoles or nested confinements, as well as addition of on‐chip structures for injection of different processing solutions, similar to previously demonstrated geometries in pressure driven probes …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probes could also be shunted over the tissue to reduce their required volume per test to around 100 nL. Indeed, with the probe hybridization so fast, the team was also able to study the kinetics of probe hybridization [77].…”
Section: Vertical Microfluidic Probe For Cell Layers and Tissue Slicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproduced with permission from Ref. [77] investigation varied, some using only 50-100 cells [41,52,58] or on the order of 1000 cells [57,75], others at tens of thousands [56,59].…”
Section: Comparison Of Microfluidic Fish Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%