2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12029-014-9605-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Testing the Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions for Gastrointestinal Cancers

Abstract: Further research is warranted to design and test interventions that may be effective in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…QOL and HRQOL were defined and delineated by the specific research report reviewed and based on the measurement tools used in the trial. Generally, the impact of exercise on both QOL and HRQOL measures was positive [15,16,20,24,25,28,32,39,43,47,50,52,57,62,64] or showed an overall positive trend toward significance, although effect size was relatively small in many of the QOL outcomes [18,38,55,59]. A small number of reviews failed to demonstrate significant impact on QOL [26,35,53,54,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…QOL and HRQOL were defined and delineated by the specific research report reviewed and based on the measurement tools used in the trial. Generally, the impact of exercise on both QOL and HRQOL measures was positive [15,16,20,24,25,28,32,39,43,47,50,52,57,62,64] or showed an overall positive trend toward significance, although effect size was relatively small in many of the QOL outcomes [18,38,55,59]. A small number of reviews failed to demonstrate significant impact on QOL [26,35,53,54,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Information was extracted and synthesized from 51 articles. Table 2 provides a summary of the included studies [15‐65]. Quality analysis, revealed a mean score of 7.7 (±2.0), and median of 8 with a range of 3‐11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Los descriptores utilizados para este fin fueron: "cancer and quality of life", "cancer and quality of life and review", "cancer and psychological intervention" y "cancer and psychological intervention and review". Además, con el objetivo de abarcar otros trabajos, incluso previos al año 2000, se han tenido en cuenta distintas revisiones publicadas por otros autores (5,7,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) . La revisión se realizó partiendo de los artículos originales, escritos en inglés y español y de los resúmenes ofrecidos en las bases de datos, en los que se especificase el procedimiento y la muestra del estudio.…”
Section: Métodounclassified