2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer patient survival in Estonia 1995–2009: Time trends and data quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple sources are used for case ascertainment, including trace-back of cases first identified via death certificates as well as linkages with the databases of cancer centers. The percentage of death certificate only (DCO) cases has been stable and around 2% for all sites and 0.6% for CM [2]. The data quality indicators have been similar for male and female cases [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multiple sources are used for case ascertainment, including trace-back of cases first identified via death certificates as well as linkages with the databases of cancer centers. The percentage of death certificate only (DCO) cases has been stable and around 2% for all sites and 0.6% for CM [2]. The data quality indicators have been similar for male and female cases [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, the age gradient increased, as younger patients experienced a larger survival gain than older patients. The major strength of this study was the use of high quality data from the ECRfor CM, 99% of cases were microscopically verified and below 1% were DCO cases [2]. Another strength of the study was the availability of data on TNM stage, which is more accurate than the commonly used classification of tumors into localized and advanced stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the ECR follows international definitions and rules, including those for multiple [7], for reporting incidence and survival. Good data quality has been shown for adult cancers [8]. According to a previous study [9], the estimated completeness of reporting of childhood cancer cases was 89.5% (81.2% for hematologic malignancies and 95.3% for solid tumors).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good data quality has been shown for adult cancers. 8 According to a previous study, 9 the estimated completeness of reporting of childhood cancer cases was 89.5% (81.2% for hematologic malignancies and 95.3% for solid tumors). As a result of the data quality study, all missing cases starting from 2000…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 96%