2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.042502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of the Two-Body Spin-Orbit Force in Nuclei

Abstract: Energies and spectroscopic factors of the first 7=2 − , 3=2 − , 1=2 − , and 5=2 − states in the 35 Si 21 nucleus were determined by means of the (d, p) transfer reaction in inverse kinematics at GANIL using the MUST2 and EXOGAM detectors. By comparing the spectroscopic information on the 35 Si and 37 S isotones, a reduction of the p 3=2 -p 1=2 spin-orbit splitting by about 25% is proposed, while the f 7=2 -f 5=2 spin-orbit splitting seems to remain constant. These features, derived after having unfolded nuclea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
1
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(92 reference statements)
3
58
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The isovector contribution is, of course, also responsible for the difference between the effective proton and neutron single-particle potentials, while the radial (density) profiles depend on the shell structure of occupied orbitals in the self-consistent solution for a particular nucleus. In this respect, especially interesting is the case of 34 Si, for which a possible central depletion of the proton density distribution has been analysed using a variety of theoretical approaches [26,27], and experimental constraints on the strength of the two-body spin-orbit interaction have been reported [15,28]. For the effective interaction DD-MEδ that explicitly includes contributions from both ρ and δ meson exchange in the direct term, the isovector channel of the spin-orbit potential is enhanced when compared to DD-ME2, although in both models the total isovector part of the spin-orbit potential is an order of magnitude weaker than the isoscalar contribution [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isovector contribution is, of course, also responsible for the difference between the effective proton and neutron single-particle potentials, while the radial (density) profiles depend on the shell structure of occupied orbitals in the self-consistent solution for a particular nucleus. In this respect, especially interesting is the case of 34 Si, for which a possible central depletion of the proton density distribution has been analysed using a variety of theoretical approaches [26,27], and experimental constraints on the strength of the two-body spin-orbit interaction have been reported [15,28]. For the effective interaction DD-MEδ that explicitly includes contributions from both ρ and δ meson exchange in the direct term, the isovector channel of the spin-orbit potential is enhanced when compared to DD-ME2, although in both models the total isovector part of the spin-orbit potential is an order of magnitude weaker than the isoscalar contribution [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clearly stated in Refs. [19,20] that the results of these two experiments are ideal for a further theoretical investigation of the SO force deduced from the various nuclear density functionals. In particular, the extreme neutron-to-proton density asymmetry in the case of 34 Si and the subsequent large and abrupt reduction in the size of the p-spitting, can provide a better constraint of the SO force, since these results isolate the contributions coming mostly from its density and its isospin dependence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…state and compare its energy directly with the experimental results from Ref. [19], as shown in table VII. This is also done schematically in Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Particle-vibration Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations