2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for convergence insufficiency using the CISS is not indicated in young adults

Abstract: AimThis paper presents Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) and orthoptic findings in a sample of typical young adults who considered themselves to have normal eyesight apart from weak spectacles.MethodsThe CISS questionnaire was administered, followed by a full orthoptic evaluation, to 167 university undergraduate and postgraduate students during the recruitment phase of another study. The primary criterion for recruitment to this study was that participants ‘felt they had normal eyesight’. A CISS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, we created a specific methodology based on scientific evidence for classifying accommodative and binocular disorders using symptoms and fundamental and complementary signs. Some authors have performed similar classifications, diagnosing a disorder according to the number of clinical signs that the subject presented, mainly for convergence insufficiency, but this is not the case for other dysfunctions. Therefore, the criteria used in this study differ substantially from those criteria employed by other authors on prevalence studies, who in no case justify why they consider those clinical signs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we created a specific methodology based on scientific evidence for classifying accommodative and binocular disorders using symptoms and fundamental and complementary signs. Some authors have performed similar classifications, diagnosing a disorder according to the number of clinical signs that the subject presented, mainly for convergence insufficiency, but this is not the case for other dysfunctions. Therefore, the criteria used in this study differ substantially from those criteria employed by other authors on prevalence studies, who in no case justify why they consider those clinical signs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, some professionals have argued that CI is not a highly symptomatic condition. Some subjects with CI who were not symptomatic might have suppression, avoidance of near visual tasks, or monocular occlusion [32,33], but this was not assessed directly in this study. Secondly, this study also revealed signi cantly lower accommodative amplitude and binocular accommodative facility in symptomatic subjects with CI compared with asymptomatic subjects with CI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding further research is warranted to investigate the effectiveness of the CISS questionnaire in screening for CI among a larger population of young African patients as a study indicates its ineffectiveness in young university adult populations' elsewhere. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%