2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Outcomes at Mid-Term Follow-Up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neumann et al 17 and Kowalczewski et al 18 reported smaller series, with 24 and 12 patients, respectively, but with more satisfactory results. Both had a minimum number of complications and good functional results, although they presented different indications: the first only performed revision surgeries and the second, only primary surgeries in patients with severe deformities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neumann et al 17 and Kowalczewski et al 18 reported smaller series, with 24 and 12 patients, respectively, but with more satisfactory results. Both had a minimum number of complications and good functional results, although they presented different indications: the first only performed revision surgeries and the second, only primary surgeries in patients with severe deformities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, Kowalzewski et al analysed 12 primary knee replacements using a rotating hinge knee prosthesis. 65 The minimum follow-up was ten years. Indications for the procedure included gross joint destruction, significant axial deformities and contracture with a dysfunctional medial collateral ligament in all cases.…”
Section: Indications For Rotating Hinge Prostheses For Revision Tkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this unusual case, such a device was implemented during the primary procedure. It has been noted in the literature that this is an appropriate salvage device in appropriate patients with good outcomes at the midterm follow-up [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%