Abstract:Objectives. To describe the epidemiology of people coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV in San Francisco, the San Francisco Department of Public Health's Communicable Disease Control and Prevention Section and the HIV Epidemiology Section collaborated to link their registries .Methods. In San Francisco, hepatitis reporting is primarily through passive laboratory-based surveillance, and HIV/AIDS reporting is primarily through laboratory-initiated active surveillance . We co… Show more
“…This is consistent with other studies that have found that male sex, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity are associated with higher risk of HIV co-infection with HBV and HCV [10, 12, 17]. The HIV transmission risk categories of individuals at highest risk for HIV co-infection with HBV or HCV in NYC were also consistent with the transmission routes of and reported risk factors for HBV and HCV [10, 11, 13–16, 18]. The largest proportion of HIV/HBV-infected individuals were MSM, while the largest proportion of HIV/HCV-infected and HIV/HBV/HCV-infected individuals had a history of IDU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Multiple clinical cohort and cross-sectional studies have studied the prevalence of and risk factors for HBV and HCV co-infection in groups of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) throughout the world [7,[10][11][12][13][14]. Another important method for assessing the prevalence of HIV co-infection with HBV and/or HCV and the characteristics of co-infected patients is to match surveillance data for each infection collected by state or local health departments [15][16][17][18]. Surveillance data are derived from large, geographically well-defined populations and include all positive tests reported to health departments; therefore, such data are more representative than data from highly specialized clinical studies, which are limited to patients selected for enrolment.…”
Using surveillance data, we describe the prevalence and characteristics of individuals in New York City (NYC) co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Surveillance databases including persons reported to the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with HIV, HBV, and HCV by 31 December 2010 and not known to be dead as of 1 January 2000, were matched with 2000-2011 vital statistics mortality data. Of 140 606 persons reported with HIV, 4% were co-infected with HBV only, 15% were co-infected with HCV only, and 1% were co-infected with HBV and HCV. In all groups, 70-80% were male. The most common race/ethnicity and HIV transmission risk groups were non-Hispanic blacks and men who have sex with men (MSM) for HIV/HBV infection, and non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and injection drug users for HIV/HCV and HIV/HBV/HCV infections. The overall age-adjusted 2000-2011 mortality was higher in co-infected than HIV mono-infected individuals. Use of population-based surveillance data provided a comprehensive characterization of HIV co-infection with HBV and HCV. Our findings emphasize the importance of targeting HIV and viral hepatitis testing and prevention efforts to populations at risk for co-infection, and of integrating HIV and viral hepatitis care and testing services.
“…This is consistent with other studies that have found that male sex, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity are associated with higher risk of HIV co-infection with HBV and HCV [10, 12, 17]. The HIV transmission risk categories of individuals at highest risk for HIV co-infection with HBV or HCV in NYC were also consistent with the transmission routes of and reported risk factors for HBV and HCV [10, 11, 13–16, 18]. The largest proportion of HIV/HBV-infected individuals were MSM, while the largest proportion of HIV/HCV-infected and HIV/HBV/HCV-infected individuals had a history of IDU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Multiple clinical cohort and cross-sectional studies have studied the prevalence of and risk factors for HBV and HCV co-infection in groups of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) throughout the world [7,[10][11][12][13][14]. Another important method for assessing the prevalence of HIV co-infection with HBV and/or HCV and the characteristics of co-infected patients is to match surveillance data for each infection collected by state or local health departments [15][16][17][18]. Surveillance data are derived from large, geographically well-defined populations and include all positive tests reported to health departments; therefore, such data are more representative than data from highly specialized clinical studies, which are limited to patients selected for enrolment.…”
Using surveillance data, we describe the prevalence and characteristics of individuals in New York City (NYC) co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Surveillance databases including persons reported to the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with HIV, HBV, and HCV by 31 December 2010 and not known to be dead as of 1 January 2000, were matched with 2000-2011 vital statistics mortality data. Of 140 606 persons reported with HIV, 4% were co-infected with HBV only, 15% were co-infected with HCV only, and 1% were co-infected with HBV and HCV. In all groups, 70-80% were male. The most common race/ethnicity and HIV transmission risk groups were non-Hispanic blacks and men who have sex with men (MSM) for HIV/HBV infection, and non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and injection drug users for HIV/HCV and HIV/HBV/HCV infections. The overall age-adjusted 2000-2011 mortality was higher in co-infected than HIV mono-infected individuals. Use of population-based surveillance data provided a comprehensive characterization of HIV co-infection with HBV and HCV. Our findings emphasize the importance of targeting HIV and viral hepatitis testing and prevention efforts to populations at risk for co-infection, and of integrating HIV and viral hepatitis care and testing services.
“…The demography of the cohort of coinfected persons in our study matched that of other US studies regarding race and sex [23–27]. HIV transmission categories were correlated with the most common viral hepatitis transmission risks in the USA (sexual transmission for HBV and IDU for HCV) [3, 31, 32].…”
SUMMARY
Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and viral hepatitis is associated with high morbidity and mortality in the absence of clinical management, making identification of these cases crucial. We examined characteristics of HIV and viral hepatitis coinfections by using surveillance data from 15 US states and 2 cities. Each jurisdiction used an automated deterministic matching method to link surveillance data for persons with reported acute and chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, to persons reported with HIV infection. Of the 504398 persons living with diagnosed HIV infection at the end of 2014, 2.0% were coinfected with HBV, and 6.7% were coinfected with HCV. Of the 269884 persons ever reported with HBV, 5.2% were reported with HIV. Of the 1093050 persons ever reported with HCV, 4.3% were reported with HIV. A greater proportion of persons coinfected with HIV and HBV were males and blacks/African Americans, compared with those with HIV monoinfection. Persons who inject drugs represented a greater proportion of those coinfected with HIV and HCV, compared with those with HIV monoinfection. Matching HIV and viral hepatitis surveillance data highlights epidemiological characteristics of persons coinfected and can be used to routinely monitor health status and guide state and national public health interventions.
“…The prevalence of HIV coinfection among CHB patients found in our study is slightly lower than the estimates published from other low HIV-prevalence settings (United States) of 5.2%–6.3% among CHB patients [26, 27], whereas the overall HIV coinfection prevalence of 5.3% among CHC patients found in our study was similar to estimates found in larger CHC patient cohorts from the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States at 5.0% and 4.3%, respectively [27, 28].…”
BackgroundEarly identification of patients with chronic viral hepatitis coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is essential for optimal care. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of HIV coinfection among patients newly diagnosed with chronic viral hepatitis, HIV testing prevalence, and identify factors associated with coinfection.MethodsPatients with chronic viral hepatitis newly enrolled in The Danish Database for Hepatitis B and C between 2002 and 2015 were identified. The HIV coinfection prevalence was calculated, and risk factors associated with HIV coinfection were estimated by logistic regression.ResultsIn total, 8490 patients were included: 3091 had chronic hepatitis B (CHB), 5305 had chronic hepatitis C (CHC), and 94 had CHB and CHC. The prevalence of HIV coinfection was 4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0–4.9) and was higher among CHC and CHB-CHC patients than CHB patients with a prevalence of 5.3% (95% CI, 4.7–5.9), 6.4% (95% CI, 2.4–13.4), and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.3–3.5), respectively (P < .0001). The HIV testing prevalence increased from 65% to 88% between 2002 and 2014 concurrently with a decrease in the HIV coinfection prevalence from 7.8% (95% CI, 5.5–10.7) to 1.6% (95% CI, 0.7–3.2). Age 35–50 years, male sex, and sexual route of viral hepatitis transmission were associated with HIV coinfection with odds ratios of 4.42 (95% CI, 1.40–13.94), 2.21 (95% CI, 1.74–2.81), and 8.81 (95% CI, 6.30–12.33), respectively.ConclusionsThe prevalence of HIV coinfection among patients with newly diagnosed chronic viral hepatitis decreased concurrently with an increase in HIV testing prevalence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.