2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-013-0063-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of interobserver agreement of magnetic resonance elastography with histopathological staging of liver fibrosis

Abstract: Interobserver agreement for liver fibrosis staging was almost perfect for both histopathology and MRE, with a significant higher agreement for MRE. Its high interobserver agreement and reliable accuracy support the use of MRE as a non-invasive screening tool for liver fibrosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a 3.0-T Philips system, similarly excellent repeatability has been shown by using a 2D GRE sequence, with a bias of just 0.21 kPa between repeated measures of liver stiffness acquired in the same patients on the same day (25). It is interesting that the greatest test-retest repeatability observed in our study was liver stiffness as an imaging surrogate for parenchymal fibrosis (1,3,22,23). For this diagnostic test to gain wide acceptance, reliability of results must be demonstrated.…”
Section: Overall and Subpopulation Agreementsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…With a 3.0-T Philips system, similarly excellent repeatability has been shown by using a 2D GRE sequence, with a bias of just 0.21 kPa between repeated measures of liver stiffness acquired in the same patients on the same day (25). It is interesting that the greatest test-retest repeatability observed in our study was liver stiffness as an imaging surrogate for parenchymal fibrosis (1,3,22,23). For this diagnostic test to gain wide acceptance, reliability of results must be demonstrated.…”
Section: Overall and Subpopulation Agreementsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…94 The inter-observer agreement in assessments for MRE has been demonstrated to be high (ICC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 – 1.00), and the agreement for MRE assessments is higher than that with pathologist staging (ICC 0.91, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.94). 95 Thus, MRE is highly accurate for detecting hepatic fibrosis, results are not influenced by patient demographics making assessments reproducible across key sub-populations, and the inter-observer agreement for staging fibrosis is nearly perfect and higher than that seen with histopathology. For these reasons, MRE is considered to be a reliable, highly accurate, and precise method for assessing hepatic fibrosis.…”
Section: Mre Based Assessment Of Hepatic Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By inversion of the wave image data, Hookean viscoelastic mechanical properties, such as the shear storage modulus G d , can be quantified [47,48]. In liver diseases MRE proves to be a technique of great diagnostic and etiologic value [4952], and is also increasingly utilized for use in the kidney, spleen, brain, breast, heart, lungs, prostate, and skeletal muscle [5361]. MRE studies of skeletal muscle have primarily focused on healthy skeletal muscle to better understand the complex anisotropic viscoelastic mechanical properties and to assess changes in muscle shear stiffness during active and passive contraction [6270].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%