Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis

Abstract

BackgroundCommunity-based organizations (CBOs) are critical channels for the delivery of health promotion programs. Much of their influence comes from the relationships they have with community members and other key stakeholders and they may be able to harness the power of social media tools to develop and maintain these relationships. There are limited data describing if and how CBOs are using social media. This study assesses the extent to which CBOs engaged in health promotion use popular social media channels, the types of content typically shared, and the extent to which the interactive aspects of social media tools are utilized.MethodsWe assessed the social media presence and patterns of usage of CBOs engaged in health promotion in Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester, Massachusetts. We coded content on three popular channels: Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. We used content analysis techniques to quantitatively summarize posts, tweets, and videos on these channels, respectively. For each organization, we coded all content put forth by the CBO on the three channels in a 30-day window. Two coders were trained and conducted the coding. Data were collected between November 2011 and January 2012.ResultsA total of 166 organizations were included in our census. We found that 42% of organizations used at least one of the channels of interest. Across the three channels, organization promotion was the most common theme for content (66% of posts, 63% of tweets, and 93% of videos included this content). Most organizations updated Facebook and Twitter content at rates close to recommended frequencies. We found limited interaction/engagement with audience members.ConclusionsMuch of the use of social media tools appeared to be uni-directional, a flow of information from the organization to the audience. By better leveraging opportunities for interaction and user engagement, these organizations can reap greater benefits from the non-trivial investment required to use social media well. Future research should assess links between use patterns and organizational characteristics, staff perspectives, and audience engagement.

Tweeting About Prostate and Testicular Cancers: What Are Individuals Saying in Their Discussions About the 2013 Movember Canada Campaign?

“…The majority of individuals tweeting about breast cancer shared messages about clothing (e.g., wearing pink) rather than early detection of breast cancer [11]. Additionally, community-based organizations were more likely to tweet about organization promotion (e.g., organization-specific news) than health education news (e.g., health tips) [12]. There has been limited research on the frequency and type of Twitter conversations about men's cancers.…”

Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States

“…On the one hand, we assessed the number of "likes," "comments," and "sharing" each unit generated. "likes" represent user engagement and accumulate when the audience presses the "like" button, a feature available for each individual post and its comments (Ramanadhan et al, 2013). At the same time, users can comment on posts and share with their contacts the posts they find interesting.…”

The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting

“…"Likes" represent user engagement, and accumulate when the audience presses the "like" button, a feature available for each individual post and its comments (Ramanadhan et al, 2013). We also assessed the number of favourites and retweets each unit collected on Twitter.…”