Nanotoxicity comparison of four amphiphilic polymeric micelles with similar hydrophilic or hydrophobic structure

Abstract

BackgroundNanocarriers represent an attractive means of drug delivery, but their biosafety must be established before their use in clinical research.ObjectivesFour kinds of amphiphilic polymeric (PEG-PG-PCL, PEEP-PCL, PEG-PCL and PEG-DSPE) micelles with similar hydrophilic or hydrophobic structure were prepared and their in vitro and in vivo safety were evaluated and compared.MethodsIn vitro nanotoxicity evaluations included assessments of cell morphology, cell volume, inflammatory effects, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and membrane fluidity. An umbilical vein cell line (Eahy.926) and a kind of macrophages (J774.A1) were used as cell models considering that intravenous route is dominant for micelle delivery systems. In vivo analyses included complete blood count, lymphocyte subset analysis, detection of plasma inflammatory factors and histological observations of major organs after intravenous administration to KM mice.ResultsAll the micelles enhanced inflammatory molecules in J774.A1 cells, likely resulting from the increased ROS levels. PEG-PG-PCL and PEEP-PCL micelles were found to increase the J774.A1 cell volume. This likely correlated with the size of PEG-PG-PCL micelles and the polyphosphoester structure in PEEP-PCL. PEG-DSPE micelles inhibited the growth of Eahy.926 cells via inducing apoptosis. This might relate to the structure of DSPE, which is a type of phospholipid and has good affinity with cell membrane. No evidence was found for cell membrane changes after treatment with these micelles for 24 h. In the in vivo study, during 8 days of 4 time injection, each of the four nanocarriers altered the hematic phase differently without changes in inflammatory factors or pathological changes in target organs.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that the micelles investigated exhibit diverse nanotoxicity correlated with their structures, their biosafety is different in different cell model, and there is no in vitro and in vivo correlation found. We believe that this study will certainly provide more scientific understandings on the nanotoxicity of amphiphilic polymeric micelles.

Mixed micelles of lipoic acid-chitosan-poly(ethylene glycol) and distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine-poly(ethylene glycol) for tumor delivery

“…3), DSPE-PEG micelles appeared similar in structure to previously reported (Zhao, 2013) micelles. Micelles of LACPEG/DSPE-PEG differed in morphology to DSPE-PEG and LACPEG micelles, confirming the production of a new carrier.…”

Anti-migratory and increased cytotoxic effects of novel dual drug-loaded complex hybrid micelles in triple negative breast cancer cells

“…After a 0.5-h incubation period, the DSPE-PEG2000/TPGS micelles showed 9.6-, 11.5-, and 5.1-fold higher uptake compared to the free dye, while TPGS micelles showed 8.1-, 10.5-, and 5.5-fold enhanced uptake, for coumarin-6 concentrations of 0.025, 0.25, and 2.5 μg/mL, respectively. The higher cellular uptake of DSPE-PEG2000/TPGS micelles compared to TPGS micelles may be due to the presence of the DSPE-PEG structure [55]. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show that the cellular uptake of the nanoparticles by the cells is both time-and dose-dependent, similarly to phenomena previously reported [56].…”

Lipid-coated ZnO nanoparticles synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity studies in cancer cell

“…The cytotoxicity of ZnO nanomaterials is related to the surface nanostructure and the extent to be internalized by cells [9]. As the surface properties and shape of the ZnO nanocrystals significantly influence the cytotoxicity, these parameters should be maintained at the desired levels [10,11].…”