The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and limitations of diffusion MRI tractography for the study of language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is known to limit the degrees of freedom in a model's topology while simultaneously imposing only minimal anatomical assumptions, and is, therefore, widely used in the neural modeling community (Sanz‐Leon, Knock, Spiegler, & Jirsa, ). Nonetheless, inferring connectional strength from diffusion tractography poses considerable methodological challenges, particularly, when assessing connections beyond major fiber tracts (Campbell & Pike, ; Thomas et al, ). Specifically, diffusion tractography does not differentiate between mono‐ and polysynaptic connections and is prone to false positive detections, particularly in areas of high fiber complexity (Jbabdi & Johansen‐Berg, ; Reveley et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is known to limit the degrees of freedom in a model's topology while simultaneously imposing only minimal anatomical assumptions, and is, therefore, widely used in the neural modeling community (Sanz‐Leon, Knock, Spiegler, & Jirsa, ). Nonetheless, inferring connectional strength from diffusion tractography poses considerable methodological challenges, particularly, when assessing connections beyond major fiber tracts (Campbell & Pike, ; Thomas et al, ). Specifically, diffusion tractography does not differentiate between mono‐ and polysynaptic connections and is prone to false positive detections, particularly in areas of high fiber complexity (Jbabdi & Johansen‐Berg, ; Reveley et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion tensor MRI tractography is currently the only method to reconstruct the in-vivo fiber pathway, but it comes with the following known confounds [2]. The method cannot model complex fiber orientations because of limited angular resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of approach necessitates evidently more processing power and time, which can limit its applicability. Even if structurally accurate, the provided reconstruction might also be possibly visualizing tracks that are anatomically accurate but progressively became functionally obsolete, in the context of brain plasticity (Campbell and Pike, 2014). Preoperative cross-validation of WMT with other techniques (functional MRI, transcranial magnetic stimulation) might be helpful in identifying those instances (Lemaire et al, 2013, Weiss et al, 2015, Weiss Lucas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Supratentorial Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%