Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation for Portuguese (Brazilian) of the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Instrument in Orofacial Pain Patients

Lima-Verde, Alexandre César; Pozza, Daniel Humberto; Rodrigues, Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha; Velly, Ana Míriam; Guimarães, Antônio Sérgio Alfredo

doi:10.11607/jop.1070

Cited by 12 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The short‐term reliability was found to be excellent ( r = 0.98, P < 0.001), which corroborated the results of prior validation studies in other medical conditions including osteoarthritis ( r = 0.95), non‐cancer pain patients ( r = 0.98) and orafacial pain ( r = 0.99) . In addition, in cohort 1, our data reveal a high concordance ( r = 0.76, P < 0.001) of PRISM scores by repeating the PRISM assessment after 3 months.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Pictorial representation of illness and self measure (PRISM): an effective tool to assess the burden of psoriasis

Fotiou

Hofmann

Kaufmann

et al. 2015

Acad Dermatol Venereol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Pictorial representation of illness and self measure (PRISM): an effective tool to assess the burden of psoriasis

Fotiou

Hofmann

Kaufmann

et al. 2015

Acad Dermatol Venereol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As will be noted below, the resultant Self-Illness Separations were not random, but behaved as expected of a measure of suffering (the smaller SIS, the greater the person’s suffering). However, 5% or fewer informants have failed to understand the task according to the basic instructions [ 4 , 11 – 13 ]. These informants were shown a second, blue, disk, again 5cm in diameter.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Instructions for the PRISM task are brief and simple. Only a small minority of informants have failed to understand the basic instructions [ 4 , 11 , 13 ], and in such cases, where PRISM is administered in the presence of a researcher or clinician, the task has become clear through the use of an example (see above). In the original study [ 2 ], 2 of 26 patients needed the example, but this may have reflected the inexperience of the researchers at the time.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Test-retest reliability of the task has been very satisfactory at intervals of a few hours (r = 0.95) [ 4 ], one day (r = 0.98) [ 15 ] and three days (ICC = 0.99) [ 13 ]. Inter-rater reliability has also been satisfactory (r = 0.79) [ 4 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Quantitatively, the most consistent significant negative correlations of Self-Illness Separation (SIS) have been with depression [ 2 , 4 , 13 , 16 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 39 , 40 ], and with pain [ 2 , 4 , 24 ] particularly appraisal of pain [ 15 ]. Studies have also reported significant negative correlations between SIS and disease-specific or generic health-related quality of life measures [ 22 , 26 , 41 – 44 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

PRISM, a Novel Visual Metaphor Measuring Personally Salient Appraisals, Attitudes and Decision-Making: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Sensky

Büchi²

2016

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPRISM (the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) is a novel, simple visual instrument. Its utility was initially discovered serendipitously, but has been validated as a quantitative measure of suffering. Recently, new applications for different purposes, even in non-health settings, have encouraged further exploration of how PRISM works, and how it might be applied. This review will summarise the results to date from applications of PRISM and propose a generic conceptualisation of how PRISM works which is consistent with all these applications.MethodsA systematic review, in the form of a qualitative evidence synthesis, was carried out of all available published data on PRISM.ResultsFifty-two publications were identified, with a total of 8254 participants. Facilitated by simple instructions, PRISM has been used with patient groups in a variety of settings and cultures. As a measure of suffering, PRISM has, with few exceptions, behaved as expected according to Eric Cassell’s seminal conceptualisation of suffering. PRISM has also been used to assess beliefs about or attitudes to stressful working conditions, interpersonal relations, alcohol consumption, and suicide, amongst others.DiscussionThis review supports PRISM behaving as a visual metaphor of the relationship of objects (eg ‘my illness’) to a subject (eg ‘myself’) in a defined context (eg ‘my life at the moment’). As a visual metaphor, it is quick to complete and yields personally salient information. PRISM is likely to have wide applications in assessing beliefs, attitudes, and decision-making, because of its properties, and because it yields both quantitative and qualitative data. In medicine, it can serve as a generic patient-reported outcome measure. It can serve as a tool for representational guidance, can be applied to developing strategies visually, and is likely to have applications in coaching, psychological assessment and therapeutic interventions.

show abstract

Suffering, psychological distress, and well‐being in Indonesia: A prospective cohort study

Cook²,

Chen

et al. 2022

Stress and Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on the subjective experience of suffering has typically focussed on older clinical samples living in Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) countries. To further extend the existing body of empirical research on suffering to less WEIRD contexts, we use three waves of data (Wave 1: December 2020; Wave 2: January 2021; Wave 3: February 2021) from a sample of nonclinical Indonesian adults (n = 594) to examine associations between suffering, two indices of psychological distress, and 10 facets of well‐being. In our primary analysis, we estimated a series of multiple regression models that adjusted for a range of sociodemographic characteristics, financial and material stability, religious/spiritual factors, prior values of overall suffering, and prior values of each outcome assessed in Wave 1. Results indicated that overall suffering assessed in Wave 2 was associated with an increase in both indices of psychological distress and a decrease in eight facets of well‐being assessed in Wave 3. Using a similar analytic approach, results from a secondary analysis indicated that higher scores on both indices of psychological distress and lower scores on seven of the well‐being facets assessed in Wave 2 were associated with worse subsequent overall suffering assessed in Wave 3. These findings contribute to empirical literature on the implications of suffering for well‐being.

show abstract

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation for Portuguese (Brazilian) of the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Instrument in Orofacial Pain Patients

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

Pictorial representation of illness and self measure (PRISM): an effective tool to assess the burden of psoriasis

Pictorial representation of illness and self measure (PRISM): an effective tool to assess the burden of psoriasis

PRISM, a Novel Visual Metaphor Measuring Personally Salient Appraisals, Attitudes and Decision-Making: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Suffering, psychological distress, and well‐being in Indonesia: A prospective cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About