2013
DOI: 10.3390/molecules18077492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic and Theoretical Studies of Some 3-(4′-Substituted phenylsulfanyl)-1-methyl-2-piperidones

Abstract: Abstract:The analysis of the IR carbonyl bands of some 3-(4′-substituted phenylsulfanyl)-1-methyl-2-piperidones 1-6 bearing substituents: NO 2 (compound 1), Br (compound 2), Cl (compound 3), H (compound 4) Me (compound 5) and OMe (compound 6) supported by B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) and PCM calculations along with NBO analysis (for compound 4) and X-ray diffraction (for 2) indicated the existence of two stable conformations, i.e., axial (ax) and equatorial (eq), the former corresponding to the most stable and the least … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the σ* C-S (3.25 eV) [18] electron-affinity energy is higher than that of σ* C-O (6.0 eV [19] or 4.2 eV [20,21]). Therefore, as shown in our previous papers [12][13][14][15][16], then X→ π* CO , σ C-X→ π* CO , π CO→ σ* C-X interactions are stronger in the gauche (axial) conformer(s) of the α-thio-carbonyl compounds (X = S) than for the analogous conformer in the α-oxa-acetophenones (X = O).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the σ* C-S (3.25 eV) [18] electron-affinity energy is higher than that of σ* C-O (6.0 eV [19] or 4.2 eV [20,21]). Therefore, as shown in our previous papers [12][13][14][15][16], then X→ π* CO , σ C-X→ π* CO , π CO→ σ* C-X interactions are stronger in the gauche (axial) conformer(s) of the α-thio-carbonyl compounds (X = S) than for the analogous conformer in the α-oxa-acetophenones (X = O).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In the last thirty years, the conformational analysis of several different carbonyl compounds performed by our research group, based on a number of spectroscopic (IR, UV, NMR, UPS and ETS) and X-ray studies supported by theoretical calculations, disclosed some relevant findings. The studies of some (α-alkylthio)-and (α-phenylthio)acetones, acetophenones, N,N-diethylamides, esters, thioesters [12,13], N-methoxy-Nmethyl amides [14], and N-methyl-δ-valerolactams [15], indicated that the simultaneous occurrence of the n S →π* CO ,  C-S →π* CO , and π CO →* C-S orbital interactions is the main controlling factor that determines the preference of the gauche (axial) conformer(s) over the cis (equatorial) one(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports from this laboratory of IR, UV, NMR and electron spectroscopies studies, supported by theoretical calculations of some (α-alkylthio)-and (α-phenylthio)acetones, acetophenones, N,N-diethylamides, esters, thioesters [1,2], N-methoxy-Nmethyl amides [3], and N-methyl-δ-valerolactams [4], indicated that the simultaneous occurrence of the nS→π*CO, sC-S→π*CO and πCO→s*C-S orbital interactions is the main controlling factor that determines the preference of the gauche (axial) conformer(s) over the cis (equatorial) one(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…11,12,[53][54][55][56] The signicance of the chemical or physical interactions between MET and radical species can be assessed by using the total sum of the delocalization energies, P E(2), obtained by summing the electron delocalization energies of all the signicant interactions between the NBO orbitals of interacting molecules. 57,58 The P E(2) values are reported in Table 3. A larger P E(2) means that the interactions, resulting from electron delocalization 2) values are a measure of the importance of chemical interaction between the investigated species.…”
Section: Inuence Of Radicals On Met-dft Insightmentioning
confidence: 99%