“…Patients in the two groups were matched by age (RYGB: 48.8 ± 7.5 years versus DSE: 47.4 ± 8.4 years, P=0.463), gender (RYGB: 66.7 % female versus DSE: 67.7% female, P=0.929), weight (RYGB: 120.1 ± 17.0 kg versus DSE: 114.3 ± 17.1 kg, P=0.186), waist-to-hip ratio (RYGB: 0.98 ± 0.08 versus DSE: 0.97 ± 0.09, P=0.580), IR (RYGB: 8.1 ± 12.2 versus DSE: 6.1 ± 6.3, P=0.444), Si (RYGB: 1.5 ± 1.2 mU/L -1 *min -1 versus DSE: 1.4 ± 1.2 mU/L -1 *min -1 , P=0.753), FPG (RYGB: 155.6 ± 47.2 mg/dL versus DSE: 149.1 ± 50.6 mg/dL, P=0.607), HbA 1 c (RYGB: 7.53 ± 1.3 % (59 ± 14.2 mmol/mol) versus DSE: 7.51 ± 1.3 % (59 ± 14.2 mmol/mol), P=0.943), Insulin (RYGB: 21.9 ± 29.4 μU/mL versus DSE: 16.9 ± 14.6 μU/mL, P=0.401), oral anti-diabetic medications (RYGB: 27% versus DSE: 29%, P=0.837) and insulin therapy (RYGB: 73% versus DSE: 71%, P=0.837). These data have been previously published [20]. …”