2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis following local recurrence after breast conserving treatment in young women with early breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for early breast cancer patients has been well established for a number of years [ 1 2 3 4 ]. Although BCS is effective in prolonging survival compared with radical mastectomy, locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates are higher after BCS than following mastectomy [ 5 6 7 8 ]. Some studies have reported rates of LRR of 11% to 16% [ 9 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for early breast cancer patients has been well established for a number of years [ 1 2 3 4 ]. Although BCS is effective in prolonging survival compared with radical mastectomy, locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates are higher after BCS than following mastectomy [ 5 6 7 8 ]. Some studies have reported rates of LRR of 11% to 16% [ 9 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young age is considered an independent negative prognostic factor for local recurrence [11][12][13] , contralateral BC 14,15 , and overall outcomes 16,17 . In addition, YWBC patients report a higher incidence of a family history of cancer, particularly BC 18,19 , suggesting a genetic component involved in the etiology of early-onset BC 19,20 .…”
Section: Histopathologic Features Of Tumors In Young Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current evidence indicates worse outcomes following LR ( Halverson et al , 1992 ; Willner et al , 1997 ; Elkhuizen et al , 2001 ; van Duijnhoven et al , 2011 ) or a worse prognosis associated only with specific LR tumour subtypes ( Koscielny and Tubiana, 1999 ). It has been suggested that a shorter disease-free interval between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and a second lesion is a determinant of poor prognosis ( Vicini et al , 2003 ; Komoike et al , 2006 ; Anderson et al , 2009 ; Botteri et al , 2010 ; Vichapat et al , 2011 ; Tanis et al , 2012 ; van Laar et al , 2013 ), and a short interval usually signals that distant metastasis has already occurred ( van der Sangen et al , 2013 ). In one paper, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) showed that in up to 25% of cases LR was likely associated with breast cancer death ( Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative G et al , 2011 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%