2013
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2012.9.11551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of California's Alcohol and Drug Screening and Brief Intervention Project for Emergency Department Patients

Abstract: Introduction: Visits to settings such as emergency departments (EDs) may present a “teachable moment” in that a patient may be more open to feedback and suggestions regarding their risky alcohol and illicit drug-use behaviors. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an 'opportunistic' public health approach that targets low-risk users, in addition to those already dependent on alcohol and/or drugs. SBIRT programs provide patients with comprehensive screening and assessments, and del… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could also be important to assess young people’s perceptions of the interaction between cigarette and marijuana use to identify relapse risk and target prevention efforts accordingly (Ramo, Liu, & Prochaska, 2013). Finally, brief, motivational interventions matched to risk level such as Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT; Woodruff, Eisenberg, McCabe, Clapp, & Hohman, 2013) could be particularly helpful with young adults who may be at risk for problems associated with substance use but may not be physically dependent or willing to engage in more intensive treatment. SBIRT screens individuals with substance use and administers treatment tailored to risk: those with low risk are given a time-limited motivational interview to increase awareness of risks, while those with high risk are offered more intensive treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could also be important to assess young people’s perceptions of the interaction between cigarette and marijuana use to identify relapse risk and target prevention efforts accordingly (Ramo, Liu, & Prochaska, 2013). Finally, brief, motivational interventions matched to risk level such as Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT; Woodruff, Eisenberg, McCabe, Clapp, & Hohman, 2013) could be particularly helpful with young adults who may be at risk for problems associated with substance use but may not be physically dependent or willing to engage in more intensive treatment. SBIRT screens individuals with substance use and administers treatment tailored to risk: those with low risk are given a time-limited motivational interview to increase awareness of risks, while those with high risk are offered more intensive treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early randomized studies of brief intervention for drug use among adults found statistically significant effects for at least one of the primary outcomes (Baker et al, 2005; Bernstein et al, 2005; Copeland et al, 2001; Davis, Baer, Saxon, & Kivlahan, 2003; Humeniuk et al, 2012; McCambridge & Strang, 2004; Stephens, Roffman, & Curtin, 2000; Zahradnik et al, 2009), although some studies found no difference in outcomes (Marsden et al, 2006; Stein, Herman & Anderson, 2009; Woodruff et al, 2014). Also, published articles on SBIRT projects for drug use funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) reported significant reductions in drug use and other problems from baseline to follow-up (Gryczynski et al, 2011; InSight Project Research Group, 2009; Madras et al, 2009; Woodruff, Eisenberg, McCabe, Clapp, & Hohman, 2013), although use of a single-group design in these projects precludes strong conclusions about the causal effect of SBIRT on drug use. The positive findings from this earlier body of research, however, have not been supported by two recent large randomized trials that found no significant effect on illicit drug use in primary healthcare settings (Roy-Byrne et al, 2014; Saitz et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Woodruff et al . ). With only 27.9% of the AOD misuse population receiving intervention for their misuse, this would be an opportunity for improvement in the care provided to these patients in the ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%