Stress and nurses' horizontal mobbing: Moderating effects of group identity and group support

Topa, Gabriela; León, Juan Antonio Moriano

doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2013.03.002

Cited by 33 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is, however, evidence that bullying among nurses is relatively common (Szutenbach, 2013; Vessey, DeMarco, Gaffney, & Budin, 2009). Studies in Europe revealed that bullying prevalence ranges from 9% (in Danish nurses in their first year postgraduation; Hogh, Hoel, & Carneiro, 2011) to over 74% (Topa & Moriano, 2013). American studies have found that incidents of weekly or daily bullying among nurses can range from 21.3% (Berry et al, 2012) to 82% (Dumont, Meisinger, Whitacre, & Corbin, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bullying in nursing evaluated by the Negative Acts Questionnaire‐Revised: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Serafin

Sak‐Dankosky

Czarkowska–Pączek

2020

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:To report a synthesis of the empirical studies that used the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) to assess bullying among nurses based on evaluation of the psychometric properties and use and usability of the instrument and identification of the variables associated with bullying.Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Four databases were used in the literature search: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus. The search was limited to original publications describing results of empirical studies written in English or Polish and published in peer-reviewed journals between 2002 and 2018.Review methods: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data and conducted quality assessment. Based on the extracted data, three separate meta-analyses were conducted.Results: Thirty-one articles were included in the review, 13 of which were selected for meta-analysis. In studies where participants reported bullying (N = 19), its prevalence ranged from 17-94%. Variables most often associated with bullying were age, educational level and years of professional experience. Usability of this instrument in different countries was supported by a high reliability in each study. In two metaanalyses, which included 12 studies with mean NAQ-R and item scores, the heterogeneity of data was calculated as high and moderate respectively. Conclusion:The good quality of the NAQ-R in determining variables related to bullying is endorsed. Variables related to bullying identified in this review could be used to map out a model of a potential bullying victim for preventative measures. Impact:The NAQ-R is a useful and reliable tool for measuring bullying among nurses; however, there remains a strong need to assure that a verified, standardized and updated bullying taxonomy is used in future studies to ensure reliable and comparable data. A model of a potential bullying victim may help nursing directors foster a healthier workplace environment, thereby improving patient outcomes in the long-term. K E Y W O R D Sbullying, management, meta-analysis, nursing practice, systematic review

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bullying in nursing evaluated by the Negative Acts Questionnaire‐Revised: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Serafin

Sak‐Dankosky

Czarkowska–Pączek

2020

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Negative behaviour among nurses, such as backstabbing (complaining to someone about a person), nonverbal innuendo (rolling of the eyes), and verbal affront (snide comments), has many names and definitions in the nursing literature including incivility, horizontal violence, horizontal mobbing and bullying (Felblinger , Griffin , Johnson & Rea , Topa & Moriano , Walrafen et al . ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Job satisfaction and horizontal violence in hospital staff registered nurses: the mediating role of peer relationships

Purpora

Blegen

2015

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mobbing behaviors, defined as a process of systematic and repeated aggression toward someone, 14 were associated with stress and negatively associated with group support and group identity. The literature referred to perceived stress in nursing practice and education as a primary factor associated with academic incivility.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nursing Academic Administrators’ Lived Experiences With Incivility and Bullying From Faculty

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are an increasing number of nursing academic administrators who identify themselves as victims of faculty incivility. This study examined experiences that academic administrators encountered with faculty incivility using a phenomenological research design. Three major themes emerged: faculty inappropriate behaviors, consequences of faculty behaviors on administrator targets, and administrators call for action. Findings revealed that incivility had devastating effects on administrators personally and professionally.

show abstract

Stress and nurses' horizontal mobbing: Moderating effects of group identity and group support

Cited by 33 publications

References 36 publications

Bullying in nursing evaluated by the Negative Acts Questionnaire‐Revised: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Bullying in nursing evaluated by the Negative Acts Questionnaire‐Revised: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Job satisfaction and horizontal violence in hospital staff registered nurses: the mediating role of peer relationships

Nursing Academic Administrators’ Lived Experiences With Incivility and Bullying From Faculty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About