2013
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2013.777046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel biofilm channel for evaluating the adhesion of diatoms to non-biocidal coatings

Abstract: Laboratory assessment of the adhesion of diatoms to non-toxic fouling-release coatings has tended to focus on single cells rather than the more complex state of a biofilm. A novel culture system based on open channel flow with adjustable bed shear stress values (0-2.4 Pa) has been used to produce biofilms of Navicula incerta. Biofilm development on glass and polydimethylsiloxane elastomer (PDMSe) showed a biphasic relationship with bed shear stress, which was characterised by regions of biofilm stability and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that, in contrast to SBMA, incorporation of CBMA did improve the AF performance of the underlying LMA coating. This differs from the results of other studies, which have found that pure SBMA self-assembled-monolayers (SAMs) performed better than similar CBMA surfaces in AF assays using the same diatom species (Finlay et al 2013;Bauer et al 2016).…”
Section: Diatom Adhesion / Ease-of-releasecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data suggest that, in contrast to SBMA, incorporation of CBMA did improve the AF performance of the underlying LMA coating. This differs from the results of other studies, which have found that pure SBMA self-assembled-monolayers (SAMs) performed better than similar CBMA surfaces in AF assays using the same diatom species (Finlay et al 2013;Bauer et al 2016).…”
Section: Diatom Adhesion / Ease-of-releasecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of CBMA, on the other hand, did not affect surface roughness to the same degree, although it did lead to increased Young's modulus and reduced AFM tip adhesion compared to both unmodified LMA and the SBMA-modified coatings. These differences in the effects of the two zwitterions on surface properties would appear to explain why the results are different from similar experiments conducted using pure zwitterionic SAMs (Finlay et al 2013;Bauer et al 2016).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Sbma and Cbma As Additives To The Lma Polymcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Attachment strengths for both organisms have been coupled to substrate wettability in a number of studies, but usually with a trend in the opposite direction between the two species. While for diatoms, adhesion was seen to be lower on hydrophilic surfaces (Finlay et al 2010, Finlay et al 2013, Schilp et al 2007, the general picture is that the removal of settled spores of U. linza in a flow channel followed a clear trend of lower adhesion (i.e.…”
Section: Adhesion Strength Of U Linza and N Incertamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A field study in which AF and fouling-release (FR) ship hull coatings were exposed to both static and dynamic conditions revealed a higher abundance of diatoms and greater biofilm adhesion strength on coatings exposed under dynamic conditions compared to those exposed to static conditions (Zargiel & Swain 2014). Finlay et al (2013) studied the settlement and adhesion of a biofilm of Navicula incerta grown under static and dynamic conditions in the laboratory. Increasing the dynamic conditions influenced both biofilm development and the adhesion strength of the diatom.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%