2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

235: The clinical implication of intra-amniotic sludge on ultrasound in patients with cervical cerclage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies were excluded from the present systematic review because they either did not report the outcomes of interest or were duplicate publications referring to the same or partially same population to that of included studies 17‐23 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seven studies were excluded from the present systematic review because they either did not report the outcomes of interest or were duplicate publications referring to the same or partially same population to that of included studies 17‐23 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies were excluded from the present systematic review because they either did not report the outcomes of interest or were duplicate publications referring to the same or partially same population to that of included studies. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Seventeen studies were included in the present systematic review with a total number of 2432 women (Table 1). [11][12][13][14][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Among them, 699 women (27.3%) had ultrasonographic evidence of AFS.…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%