2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/906180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epibenthic Assessment of a Renewable Tidal Energy Site

Abstract: Concern over global climate change as a result of fossil fuel use has resulted in energy production from renewable sources. Marine renewable energy devices provide clean electricity but can also cause physical disturbance to the local environment. There is a considerable paucity of ecological data at potential marine renewable energy sites that is needed to assess potential future impacts and allow optimal siting of devices. Here, we provide a baseline benthic survey for the Big Russel in Guernsey, UK, a poten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The species observed in the present study were consistent with those typically recorded for high current flow environments from other comparable benthic studies around the UK [ 11 , 33 , 34 ]. The most common species recorded in the Strangford Narrows were the soft coral dead-men’s fingers Alcyonium digitatum , the sponge Halichondria panacea , and various members from the Bryozoa, Cnidaria and Porifera Phyla most noticeably Alcyonidium spp., Obelia spp., Sagartia spp., and representatives from the spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The species observed in the present study were consistent with those typically recorded for high current flow environments from other comparable benthic studies around the UK [ 11 , 33 , 34 ]. The most common species recorded in the Strangford Narrows were the soft coral dead-men’s fingers Alcyonium digitatum , the sponge Halichondria panacea , and various members from the Bryozoa, Cnidaria and Porifera Phyla most noticeably Alcyonidium spp., Obelia spp., Sagartia spp., and representatives from the spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Habitats in these environments have been described as rich in terms of biodiversity and production [ 11 , 32 ]. However in comparison to low energy flow environments, here defined as < 1 m/s, few studies have been carried out that quantitatively describe the natural variability of the benthic communities in these high energy flow environments [ 15 , 33 , 34 ] and none directly related to absolute velocities. This is perhaps unsurprising given that marine soft-sediment habitats, associated with low velocity environments, are the most common benthic habitats in the marine environment covering approximately 70% of the planet [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age has been shown to explain considerable variation in community structure in artificial habitats (Knott et al 2004, Sammarco et al 2004, Perkol-Finkel et al 2005, Pinn et al 2005b, but see Wendt et al 1989. Sheehan et al (2013) recently highlighted the importance of appropriate monitoring of artificial structures over long timescales to effectively assess their ecological impact. At the Wave Hub site in the south of England, they observed recovery of opportunistic and fast-growing reef species on the cable rock armouring route within 2 years of construction.…”
Section: The Influence Of Structure Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved through active acoustic surveys, turbine-mounted cameras, bird-borne cameras or GPS coupled with TDR and (preferably) accelerometery, as well as integrated instrumentation platforms (Appendix 1, Table 2, Figure 3). The analysis of turbine-mounted camera footage, as trialled with wave energy devices (Jackson 2014;Bicknell et al 2019), is a priority as evasion and/or collision events are most readily identifiable with this method. Quantifying the prevalence of conveyor belt foraging near turbines also merited as the prevalence of this behaviour will influence detection probability.…”
Section: Collision Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%