2013
DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Prone Position in Morbidly Obese Patients With ARDS

Abstract: PP seems safe in obese patients and may improve oxygenation more than in nonobese patients. Obese patients could be a subgroup of patients with ARDS who may benefit the most of PP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,24,56,80,81,101 Of the observational studies reviewed that measured P aO 2 /F IO 2 , the mean increase ranged from 21 to 161 mm Hg (19 -168% improvement). 26,27,[29][30][31][32][33]36,37,82,[84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97]42,103,105,108 The magnitude of improvement in P aO 2 /F IO 2 among morbidly obese subjects versus nonobese subjects with ARDS was found to be significantly greater (104 mm Hg vs 61 mm Hg, respectively, P ϭ .04) and was also observed in a larger proportion of subjects (77% vs 50%, respectively, P ϭ .044). 105 Similar positive responses also have been reported in subjects without ARDS, where the mean P aO 2 /F IO 2 increase was from 39 -192 mm Hg (24 -267% improvement).…”
Section: Magnitude Of Oxygenation Responsementioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2,3,24,56,80,81,101 Of the observational studies reviewed that measured P aO 2 /F IO 2 , the mean increase ranged from 21 to 161 mm Hg (19 -168% improvement). 26,27,[29][30][31][32][33]36,37,82,[84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97]42,103,105,108 The magnitude of improvement in P aO 2 /F IO 2 among morbidly obese subjects versus nonobese subjects with ARDS was found to be significantly greater (104 mm Hg vs 61 mm Hg, respectively, P ϭ .04) and was also observed in a larger proportion of subjects (77% vs 50%, respectively, P ϭ .044). 105 Similar positive responses also have been reported in subjects without ARDS, where the mean P aO 2 /F IO 2 increase was from 39 -192 mm Hg (24 -267% improvement).…”
Section: Magnitude Of Oxygenation Responsementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Among the 31 observational studies reviewed, between 54 and 100% exhibited improved oxygenation. Twenty percent of studies reported a positive oxygenation response in Ͻ70% of subjects, 35,56,80,81,85,94 whereas 47% reported a positive response in 70 -85% of subjects, 3,30,32,37,82,84,86,92,97,102,105,108,115 and 33% of studies found improved oxygenation in approximately Ն90% of subjects. 24 …”
Section: Prevalence Of Positive Oxygenation Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations