2013
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary role of a polymerase chain reaction test in the diagnosis of onychomycosis

Abstract: This study demonstrates that PCR increases the sensitivity of detection of dermatophytes in nail specimens. Despite its limitations, the use of PCR can complement direct microscopic examination and fungal cultures to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of suspected dermatophytic onychomycosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main drawback of culture remains the slow growth of dermatophytes, delaying the results by up to 6 weeks in the event of supplementary tests to enhance frequent weak sporulation . Mycological culture is highly specific, but negative results associated with a positive microscopic direct examination are found in up to 40% of cases, impeding its sensitivity . In our study, the different LCA models resulted in a 100% specificity for culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The main drawback of culture remains the slow growth of dermatophytes, delaying the results by up to 6 weeks in the event of supplementary tests to enhance frequent weak sporulation . Mycological culture is highly specific, but negative results associated with a positive microscopic direct examination are found in up to 40% of cases, impeding its sensitivity . In our study, the different LCA models resulted in a 100% specificity for culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In another study, employment of PCR increased detection of T. rubrum in nail scrapings by approximately 20 %, whereas positive T. rubrum culture but negative PCR was found in 3 % of samples (Brasch et al, 2011). In addition, the specific commercial PCR, used in the present study, was evaluated in four other studies also (Brillowska-Dabrowska et al, 2007, 2010Chandran et al, 2013;Kondori et al, 2010). These studies outline the importance of the dermatophyte PCR kit use as it increases detection rates by 10 to 19.5 %, as compared to cultures alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Conventional PCRs benefit from simplicity and lower cost, and target the identification of the most common dermatophyte, T. rubrum (Brasch et al, 2011), or pan-dermatophytes (Dhib et al, 2012;Luk et al, 2012). By means of a multiplex PCR, simultaneous identification of T. rubrum and pan-dermatophytes (Brillowska-Dabrowska et al 2007, 2010Kondori et al, 2010;Chandran et al, 2013; the present study) or T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes and pan-dermatophytes (Dhib et al, 2014) is achieved. Moreover, Kim et al (2011) identified nine different dermatophyte species, and Mehlig et al (2014) identified an assortment of dermatophytes along with non-dermatophyte moulds (Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Aspergillus spp.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Tenyésztés mellett a mikroszkópos vizsgálat is része a laboratóriumi vizsgálatnak, mert a számos esetben negatív tenyésztési eredmény mellett a mikroszkópos vizsgálat pozitivitása vezet diagnózishoz. (8) A hagyományos diagnosztikai módszerek mellett rendkívül hasznos vizsgálat a PCR technika is, amely magas szenzitivitásával segíti a diagnó-zist, valamint magas negatív prediktív értéke is van (9).…”
Section: Megbeszélésunclassified