2013
DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.198218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Serum Cotinine Levels and Hypertension in Never Smokers

Abstract: Seated systolic and diastolic BPs were measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer according to the American Heart Association and the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7). 13,14 Up to 3 measurements were averaged for systolic and diastolic pressures. Patients were considered hypertensive if they reported physician diagnosis of hypertension, current BP-reducing medication use, or had systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
21
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
3
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, there are only a few studies that investigated the relationship between SHS exposure and high blood pressure among never-smokers. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008, in never-smoker adults, higher SHS exposure objectively measured by serum cotinine levels was found to be associated with SBP and hypertension independent of age, sex, ethnicity, education, alcohol drinking, BMI, glycohemoglobin, total cholesterol, and other confounders [10]. The unfavorable effect of passive smoking starts already at young age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the contrary, there are only a few studies that investigated the relationship between SHS exposure and high blood pressure among never-smokers. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008, in never-smoker adults, higher SHS exposure objectively measured by serum cotinine levels was found to be associated with SBP and hypertension independent of age, sex, ethnicity, education, alcohol drinking, BMI, glycohemoglobin, total cholesterol, and other confounders [10]. The unfavorable effect of passive smoking starts already at young age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5 In these lines, the association of a clinically guided serum cotinine measurement with BP levels could not be definitive without ambulatory BP evaluation. Beyond the above considerations, the study by Alshaarawy et al 1 further confirms that passive smoking should be addressed in combination with other demographic and lifestyle characteristics during the usual clinic BP evaluation. Measurement of cotinine levels might not have clinical importance when measured separately of structured questionnaires evaluating smoking dynamics, but potentially could refine the clinical research in the field.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We should acknowledge that beyond BP variability evaluation 2 completely lacking in the present study, there might also be variability in cotinine levels. 3 This latter phenomenon could not be ruled out by the design of the present study, 1 as exposure was not evaluated by structured questionnaires examining the periodicity of the exposure. 4 The integration of passive smoking characteristics (ie, intensity, duration, environment of exposure) with cotinine levels would have provided a more integrated approach of passive smoking dynamics.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…44 Hasil penelitian ini bertolak belakang dengan beberapa hasil penelitian dan teori yang menyebutkan bahwa nikotin dalam rokok dapat menyebabkan terjadinya pengapuran pada dinding pembuluh darah sehingga merokok sebanyak 2 batang saja akan meningkatkan tekanan sisitolik maupun diastolik sebesar 10 mmHg dan kadar cotinine serum lebih tinggi pada perokok berisiko 3 kali lebih besar terhadap tekanan darah sistolik. [45][46][47] Hasil penelitian ini berbeda dikarenakan proporsi responden yang tidak memiliki kebiasaan merokok lebih besar daripada yang memiliki kebiasaan merokok.…”
unclassified