Indonesia Today 2001
DOI: 10.1355/9789812305114-028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

23. The Criminal State: Premanisme and the New Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the New Order period, militias were routinely utilised as part of the coercive apparatus of Suharto's regime-a pattern that supported and deepened the presence of these organisations in Indonesian political life, laying the foundations for their contemporary presence. One further result is that the state and militias are in some respects joined in the Indonesian political imaginary, not least because the state has at times behaved very much like a criminal gang(s), and vice versa (Lindsey 2001). Democratic transition has not seen the demise of these groups.…”
Section: Conflict Civilian Militias and Democratic Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the New Order period, militias were routinely utilised as part of the coercive apparatus of Suharto's regime-a pattern that supported and deepened the presence of these organisations in Indonesian political life, laying the foundations for their contemporary presence. One further result is that the state and militias are in some respects joined in the Indonesian political imaginary, not least because the state has at times behaved very much like a criminal gang(s), and vice versa (Lindsey 2001). Democratic transition has not seen the demise of these groups.…”
Section: Conflict Civilian Militias and Democratic Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand this phenomenon, it is helpful to draw on Ian Wilson's (2015) work, which extends Lindsey's (2001) analysis of links between militias and the state during the New Order. Wilson (2015, 170) suggests that the Indonesian state can be usefully understood in terms of the 'politics of protection rackets'.…”
Section: Conflict Civilian Militias and Democratic Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the regime used civilian proxies and gangs to conduct some of its dirty business. Some argue that the state operated in ways analogous to a criminal gang, normalizing violence and extortion as state practice (Lindsey 2001;Schulte Nordholt 2002). With the transition to Reformasi, the police achieved more autonomy, while the military lost its former near-monopoly on the securitization of society.…”
Section: The Politics Of (In)securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the state had to maintain constant vigilance (waspadai) on behalf of the people against the 'subversive forces' from 'certain quarters of society' that threatened the safety and order of the state (see Barker, 2001;Bourchier, 1990). These imagined forces -which were often equated with crime or communism but remained vaguely defined as 'certain quarters' (pihak tertentu) -served an important political function as legitimization for the maintenance of a rationalist form of 'political paranoia' (Bubandt, forthcoming;Lindsey, 2001).…”
Section: The History Of the 'Safe Nation' In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am thinking in particular of the 'privatization' of crime prevention through the rise of security providers, such as traditional guards and security groups (satgas), as well as criminal militias, formerly controlled by the military(Barker, 2001;Lindsey, 2001). The imaginaries and practices related to the private provision of security are, however, part of the general trend I have discussed here.at Selcuk Universitesi on February 3, 2015 sdi.sagepub.com Downloaded from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%