Untitled

Liu, James H.; Latané, Bibb

doi:10.1023/a:1024828729174

Cited by 40 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consider first the interactive effect of ideology and extremity. Because attitude extremity is associated with attitude importance (Karpinski, Steinman, & Hilton, 2005;Krosnick, 1988;Liu & Latane, 1998;Petty & Krosnick, 2014), we expect that the effect 4 In the current study we treat ideology and extremity as two separate concepts that have both linear and interactive effects, unlike previous studies that captured the effect of extremity by assuming that ideology has a nonlinear effect on the dependent variable of interest (see also the Method section for a discussion of this issue). The relationship between cognitive ability, ideology, and ideological intolerance according to the traditional asymmetric view.…”

Section: Ideological Extremitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant.

Ganzach¹,

Schul²

2021

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we examine intolerance toward ideological outgroups, conceptualized as the negativity of the attitudes of liberals and conservatives toward their ideological outgroup. We show that conservatives are more ideologically intolerant than liberals and that the more intelligent are more ideologically intolerant than the less intelligent. We also show that the differences between liberals and conservatives and the differences between the more and less intelligent depend on ideological extremity: They are larger for extreme than for moderate ideologists. The implication of these results to questions regarding the relationship between intelligence and ideological intolerance and regarding the relationship between ideology and prejudice are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Ideological Extremitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant.

Ganzach¹,

Schul²

2021

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another possible method of investigation involves catastrophe modeling, which is frequently used by the DSP researchers (e.g., Zeeman, 1977; Latané and Nowak, 1994; Guastello, 1995; Liu and Latané, 1998; Guastello et al, 2012) to investigate change in the number of attractors as a function of a splitting factor (in our case, priming would be the splitting factor). Resources that can be consulted for catastrophe modeling include Cobb (1981), Grasman et al (2009); Guastello (2011a,b); Van der Maas et al (2003), and Zeeman (1976).…”

Section: Connecting the Dynamical Systems Perspective To Behavioral Pmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavioral Priming 2.0: Enter a Dynamical Systems Perspective

Krpan

2017

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On a daily basis, people are exposed to numerous stimuli, ranging from colors and smells to sounds and words, that could potentially activate different cognitive constructs and influence their actions. This type of influence on human behavior is referred to as priming. Roughly two decades ago, behavioral priming was hailed as one of the core forces that shape automatic behavior. However, failures to replicate some of the representative findings in this domain soon followed, which posed the following question: “How robust are behavioral priming effects, and to what extent are they actually important in shaping people's actions?” To shed a new light on this question, I revisit behavioral priming through the prism of a dynamical systems perspective (DSP). The DSP is a scientific paradigm that has been developed through a combined effort of many different academic disciplines, ranging from mathematics and physics to biology, economics, psychology, etc., and it deals with behavior of simple and complex systems over time. In the present paper, I use conceptual and methodological tools stemming from the DSP to propose circumstances under which behavioral priming effects are likely to occur. More precisely, I outline three possible types of the influence of priming on human behavior, to which I refer as emergence, readjustment, and attractor switch, and propose experimental designs to examine them. Finally, I discuss relevant implications for behavioral priming effects and their replications.

show abstract

“…However, partisan identity has been shown to be a relatively poor predictor of issue attitudes and preferences, particularly in the general electorate (e.g., Liu & Latané, 1998). Additionally, work related to the theory of planned behavior has demonstrated that evaluative positions are increasingly predictive of subsequent behavioral action to the extent that the evaluative position is specifically aligned with that behavior (Ajzen, 1985(Ajzen, , 1987.…”

Section: Level Of Specificity In Initial Attitude Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%