2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00350-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

22 week assessment of bladder acellular matrix as a bladder augmentation material in a porcine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has been utilized previously to engineer the urinary bladder wall with and without cell seeding. Previous studies have shown that to maintain graft size, cell seeding of the SIS prior to implantation is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has been utilized previously to engineer the urinary bladder wall with and without cell seeding. Previous studies have shown that to maintain graft size, cell seeding of the SIS prior to implantation is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilayered bladder growth was seen at 1 month and included urothelium, angiogenesis and organized smooth muscle. At longer time intervals, graft shrinkage and a lack of central organized smooth muscle were observed, 23 likely consistent with inadequate neovascularization. Thus, while unseeded SIS and bladder ECM have shown the ability to participate in the regenerative process, several limitations have prevented this technology from progressing to clinical implementation.…”
Section: Unseeded Technologymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Autologous materials have proven difficult to reproduce as a result of increased patient morbidity associated with the graft harvest (56). The increased cost in allograft and xenograft material production, in addition to the risk of disease transmission and varied mechanical strength, is crucial in their limited clinical application (56,57). Furthermore, the use of natural decellularised matrices requires tissue that exhibits no principal pathological change, and is therefore unfeasible in certain patients (58,59).…”
Section: Naturally Derived Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%