2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

22.8% efficient ion implanted PERC solar cell with a roadmap to achieve 23.5% efficiency: A process and device simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it will also create a sufficient electric field to prevent the movement of holes towards the interface oxide and suppress their recombination with electrons. While the electron selective contact is successfully applied on the front side with SILO-ED contact, the metal-semiconductor interface on the back side remains un-passivated and causes recombination of light-generated charge carriers on the order of 10 7 cm s −1 [18]. Therefore, the impact of the back contact SRV is also investigated for single SILO-ED device to examine the efficiency potential.…”
Section: Single Silo-ed Based Perc Solar Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it will also create a sufficient electric field to prevent the movement of holes towards the interface oxide and suppress their recombination with electrons. While the electron selective contact is successfully applied on the front side with SILO-ED contact, the metal-semiconductor interface on the back side remains un-passivated and causes recombination of light-generated charge carriers on the order of 10 7 cm s −1 [18]. Therefore, the impact of the back contact SRV is also investigated for single SILO-ED device to examine the efficiency potential.…”
Section: Single Silo-ed Based Perc Solar Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it provides higher efficiency potential than the Al-BSF device [13][14][15]; contact recombination loss in passivated PERC devices near the metal/silicon interface still exists. When metal is placed directly near the silicon interface, it generates a higher surface recombination velocity (SRV) (∼10 6 cm s −1 ), leading to ∼50% contact recombination losses [16][17][18]. Thus, contact recombination losses have emerged as a limiting factor in PERC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the critical challenges in developing lead-free F-PSCs is maintaining their efficiency while achieving the necessary flexibility and mechanical stability. To address these challenges, researchers have explored different strategies using flexible substrates, improved materials engineering, and novel device architectures [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar architecture between PERC and Al-BSF allows PERC to be integrated into industrial Al-BSF workflows without much disruption. Many efforts have been made to increase the cell efficiency of PERC (Kashyap et al, 2022a;Kashyap et al, 2022b;Kashyap et al, 2022c;Kashyap et al, 2022d;Kashyap et al, 2022e). Also, PERC cells are able to be made bifacial (Deline et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%