218 Immunological biomarkers and injury prevention in athletes

Vermeir, Peter; Goethals, Annelies; Heyerick, Myrte; Houttekiet, Emma; Vermeir, Ruben; Mariman, An; Vogelaers, Dirk; Bossche, Luc Vanden

doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-ioc.201

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach helps to communicate and justify unpleasant measures that may involve personal limitations and sacrifices. It also facilitates the support for corrective actions as they are seen as a means to restore normalcy quickly (Vermeer et al. , 2020; Paicu and Franco, 2016; Coombs, 2014).…”

Section: Stakeholder Types and Counteracting Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability communication: how to communicate an inconvenient truth in the era of scientific mistrust

Voci,

Karmasin

2023

JCOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis conceptual paper aims to explore the current state of sustainability communication research, focusing on the challenges of communicating inconvenient truths in an era of scientific mistrust. Therefore, this study aims to (1) examine the existing research landscape in sustainability communication, (2) identify unresolved problems and challenges, and (3) propose strategies for counteract misinformation through targeted communication.Design/methodology/approachFor this, the authors conducted a critical literature review and analyzed the resulting sample (n = 473 journal articles) by means of qualitative content analysis to (1) evaluate existing communication approaches dealing with the communication of sustainability's inconvenient truth, (2) identify stakeholder groups involved in sustainability communication, (3) discuss limitations of current communication approaches and (4) present recommendations on (more) effective communication strategies to address the unresolved issues in sustainability communication.FindingsThe analysis reveals that when it comes to sustainability communication and its unresolved problems, literature refers to four key stakeholder groups: (1) science deniers; (2) adaptation skeptics; (3) whitewashers and (4) world saviors. Furthermore, the analysis provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics involved in communicating sustainability, emphasizes the need for tailored approaches to engage and address the concerns of each stakeholder group, and exposes limitations in current communication methods and approaches. Accordingly, the analysis highlights the necessity of developing new theories, models and methods specific to sustainability communication to tackle its unique challenges effectively.Research limitations/implicationsLike our society, communication sciences need a fundamental transformation to meet sustainability communication's new challenges induced by the necessary shift toward sustainable development.Originality/valueThis paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of sustainability communication in research, specifically addressing the challenges of effectively communicating unpleasant news in the context of scientific mistrust. It fills a gap in existing literature by examining the progress made in addressing these issues and identifying the emerging challenges that need to be addressed.

show abstract

Section: Stakeholder Types and Counteracting Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%