2018
DOI: 10.1785/0220180198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2016 Central Italy Earthquakes Recorded by Low‐Cost MEMS‐Distributed Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… This dataset stands apart from conventional earthquake waveform datasets that include data from networks or databases managed by national monitoring agencies with higher-quality instrumentation, such as [ 1 , 2 ]. While other works have evaluated MEMS devices for structural monitoring [3] , seismology [4] , and analysis of Italian seismicity [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , this dataset has been tailored for the development of ML applications. It can be utilized to develop models and algorithms based on carefully annotated, low-cost sensor data acquired during seismic events.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This dataset stands apart from conventional earthquake waveform datasets that include data from networks or databases managed by national monitoring agencies with higher-quality instrumentation, such as [ 1 , 2 ]. While other works have evaluated MEMS devices for structural monitoring [3] , seismology [4] , and analysis of Italian seismicity [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , this dataset has been tailored for the development of ML applications. It can be utilized to develop models and algorithms based on carefully annotated, low-cost sensor data acquired during seismic events.…”
Section: Value Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, rougher information about the arrivals or about the amplitude of seismic waves would result in relevant uncertainties in the estimation of the location of a given earthquake or into a weak assessment of its energy release (i.e., earthquake magnitude) although some results are encouraging [65,66,67]. However, MEMS stations could contribute for temporary network tightening in case of seismic crisis when a fast monitoring enhancement around the epicentral area is desirable, also with the help of local citizens [43,44,68]. Moreover, in the cases when a certain degree of redundancy is required (e.g., diversification of the instruments or of the transmission protocols), then a mixed traditional-MEMS network could represent a proper solution in terms of cost–benefit ratio [28,67,69,70,71].…”
Section: Application Of Capacitive Mems Accelerometers To Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, several authors (Avallone et al, 2009(Avallone et al, , 2012Bock et al, 2004;Cheloni et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2007;Xiang et al, 2019) demonstrated that the GPS instruments are able to infer the dynamic features of fault rupture processes, when they are set up with an high frequency sampling interval (≤ 1 Hz). These dynamic observations are several orders of magnitude less sensitive than the common high quality seismometers readings, but do not suffer from drift, clipping, or instrument tilting (Avallone et al, 2009).…”
Section: Comparison Between Low-cost Mems Sensor and Gps Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%