2013
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.01505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2011 AOA Symposium: Tissue Engineering and Tissue Regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of PRP to enhance bone regeneration was first proposed by Marx in 1998, when it was used to enhance healing of mandibular defects. 41 It has since been widely studied in other craniofacial applications, as well as orthopedic applications 2,22 including long bone fractures, 52 ligamentous repair, 48 intervertebral disk regeneration, 16,44,60 and spinal fusion. Additionally, it has been used to enhance fat grafting in reconstructive surgery with variable success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PRP to enhance bone regeneration was first proposed by Marx in 1998, when it was used to enhance healing of mandibular defects. 41 It has since been widely studied in other craniofacial applications, as well as orthopedic applications 2,22 including long bone fractures, 52 ligamentous repair, 48 intervertebral disk regeneration, 16,44,60 and spinal fusion. Additionally, it has been used to enhance fat grafting in reconstructive surgery with variable success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing occurrence of bone disorders such as high-energy fractures, congenital deformities, osteomyelitis, osteometabolic diseases and neoplasms that require reconstructive surgical interventions, stimulated the search for new therapies considering the limitations of natural bone regeneration in situations with marked loss of bone mass [ 1 , 2 ]. The autologous graft remains the gold standard in reconstructive surgical treatments, as it presents characteristics of osteoinduction, osteogenesis and osteoconduction in the regenerative process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As médias e desvios-padrão do volume percentual relativo de osso neoformado no defeito craniano do grupo controle (G1), dos grupos enxertados com membrana de elastina 24h/37°C (G2 a G4) e dos grupos enxertados com membrana de serosa de intestino porcino 24h/25°C (G5 a G7), foram: 5, 86±2,87; 13,68±1,44; 17,65±1,85; 29,46±3,21; 53,20±4,46; 30,45±4,12; 38,47±5,32, respectivamente. Os biomateriais mostraramse biocompatíveis e o grupo 5 (G5-SIP24/25) apresentou a maior neoformação óssea. (RODEO et al, 2013;QUINNAN, 2017).…”
unclassified