2005 – 2015 Yılları Arasında Türkiye’de Isı ve Sıcaklık Hakkındaki Kavram Yanılgılarıyla İlgili Yapılan Çalışmalar: Bir İçerik Analizi

Abstract

-Heat and temperature are two concepts that we often meet in daily life. Thus, in the present study it is aimed to determine misconceptions about heat and temperature. In the paper, the studies found in the literature conducted on misconceptions about heat and temperature between the years 2005-2015 were examined. Document analyses was used as the method of study. The data were analyzed by content analysis method. The study was limited to the studies originated in Turkey and found in the databases of "EBSCO", "Tübitak Journalpark", and "National Thesis Center" between the years of 2 005-2015. The review focused on the detected misconceptions and the methods for detecting these misconceptions. It was found that there were differences in the methods for detecting these misconceptions between the periods of 2005-2009 and 2010-2015. A total of one hundred twenty-one misconceptions were identified. In fifty-six of the misconceptions, the concept of temperature was misused, in fourty-four of them, the concept of heat was misused, and in twenty-one of them, the concepts of heat and temperature were mistakenly used together.

Thematic Content Analysis of Studies Concerning Misconceptions in Science Education in Turkey

“…As a result of the analysis of the studies examining the misconceptions about gases, Mesin et al (2019) concluded that the studies were mostly in the article type. Although in a specific area, as a result of their content analysis of the studies on misconceptions about heattemperature in Turkey, Tamkavas et al (2016) also stated that despite decreases in some years, there was an increase towards 2015 in general. Likewise, in the study of Aydoğan and Köksal (2017), it is seen that most studies were conducted between the 2005-2012 education years.…”

2007 – 2017 Yılları Arasında Türkiye’de Gazlar Konusunda Kavram Yanılgıları İle İlgili Yapılan Çalışmalar: Bir İçerik Analizi

“…kavram yanılgısı incelediğimiz çalışmalarda tespit edilmeyen farklı bir kavram yanılgısıdır (Erceg, et al, 2016 incelendiğinde aşamalı testlerin kavram yanılgısı belirlemede etkili olduğu anlaşılmıştır. (Tamkavas, Kıray, Koçak & Koçak, 2016). Kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesinde dört aşamalı kavram yanılgısı testlerinin kullanılmasının, iki ya da üç aşamalı testlerle incelenmesine göre çok daha etkili sonuçlar ortaya çıkaracağı belirtilmiştir (Taşlıdere, 2016, Bozdağ & Ok, 2018.…”