2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2004 WHO Classification of the Renal Tumors of the Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
529
0
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 762 publications
(564 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
529
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients were staged according to the 2002 TNM criteria [24], and nuclear grading was assigned according to criteria proposed by Fuhrman et al [25]. The histopathology was reviewed according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification [26].…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were staged according to the 2002 TNM criteria [24], and nuclear grading was assigned according to criteria proposed by Fuhrman et al [25]. The histopathology was reviewed according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification [26].…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] It is currently defined by strict morphologic criteria according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors. 1 Currently it is classified as a subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma; however, due to the excellent prognosis and distinct morphology debate exists regarding the nature of this tumor and whether it truly represents a variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal cancer, a common neoplasm in Western Countries with more than 62,000 expected deaths in the USA in 2016 4 , is a complex disease with several distinct tumor subtypes 5, 6 . CCRCC is by far the most common renal cancer histological variant, accounting for 75 to 80% of renal neoplasms in adults 7 .…”
Section: The Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%