Predictive relations are developed for peak ground acceleration (PGA) from the engineering seismoscope (SRR) records of the 2001 M w 7.7 Bhuj earthquake and 239 strong-motion records of 32 significant aftershocks of 3.1 B M w B 5.6 at epicentral distances of 1 B R B 288 km. We have taken advantage of the recent increase in strong-motion data at close distances to derive new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration in the Kachchh seismic zone, Gujarat. This new analysis uses the Joyner-Boore's method for a magnitude-independent shape, based on geometrical spreading and anelastic attenuation, for the attenuation curve. The resulting attenuation equation is, lnðYÞ ¼ À7:9527 þ 1:4043 M W À ln r 2 jb þ 19:82 2 1=2 À0:0682 S for 3:1 \ M W 7:7 std: dev: r ð Þ : AE0:8243; where, Y is peak horizontal acceleration in g, M w is moment magnitude, r jb is the closest distance to the surface projection of the fault rupture in kilometers, and S is a variable taking the values of 0 and 1 according to the local site geology. S is 0 for a rock site, and, S is 1 for a soil site. The relation differs from previous work in the improved reliability of input parameters and large numbers of strong-motion PGA data recorded at short distances (0-50 km) from the source. The relation is in demonstrable agreement with the recorded strongground motion data from earthquakes of M w 3.5, 4.1, 4.5, 5.6, and 7.7. There are insufficient data from the Kachchh region to adequately judge the relation for the magnitude range 5.7 B M w B 7.7. But, our groundmotion prediction model shows a reasonable correlation with the PGA data of the 29 March, 1999 Chamoli main shock (M w 6.5), validating our ground-motion attenuation model for an M w 6.5 event. However, our groundmotion prediction shows no correlation with the PGA data of the 10 December, 1967 Koyna main shock (M w 6.3). Our ground-motion predictions show more scatter in estimated residual for the distance range (0-30 km), which could be due to the amplification/noise at near stations situated in the Kachchh sedimentary basin. We also noticed smaller residuals for the distance range (30-300 km), which could be due to less amplification/noise at sites distant from the Kachchh basin. However, the observed less residuals for the longer distance range (100-300 km) are less reliable due to the lack of available PGA values in the same distance range.Pure and Applied Geophysics studied intraplate region in the world. However, no strong-motion records from large earthquakes (M w > 7) are available for ENA. Thus, the ground-motion attenuation relations for ENA have been estimated based on stochastic modeling using constraints from the strong-motion records of smaller earthquakes (M B