Language Diversity in the Pacific 2006
DOI: 10.21832/9781853598685-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2. World Languages Review: Some Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be worthwhile to note a study by Barrena, Idiazabal, Junyent, Ortega, and Uranga (2006); the study shows the importance of official or co-official status, nationally or regionally, for regional languages. Based on an analysis of UNESCO's worldwide study of the local languages, they state: It is to be noted that most of the languages that had declined were languages that did not have any official recognition.…”
Section: Language Policy Revision For Heritage Language: a Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be worthwhile to note a study by Barrena, Idiazabal, Junyent, Ortega, and Uranga (2006); the study shows the importance of official or co-official status, nationally or regionally, for regional languages. Based on an analysis of UNESCO's worldwide study of the local languages, they state: It is to be noted that most of the languages that had declined were languages that did not have any official recognition.…”
Section: Language Policy Revision For Heritage Language: a Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allocation of public domains for RIHLs is essential for their conservation. In this respect, Barrena et al (2006), in a study involving 525 languages across the world, revealed that most languages that declined did not have any official recognition. Meanwhile, among languages that increased their speakers, 59% were official and 40% were (co-)official, in which they were given allocations in public domains.…”
Section: Sage Openmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss might discourage people from cultivating RIHLs and they might choose to raise their children in the language that was more widely used (e.g., Sugiharto, 2014). Furthermore, Barrena et al (2006) revealed that 99% of the languages that stayed, or thrived, had official or co-official status, as the status endows them with allocation in various public domains. Thus, to stem their decline, RIHLs need more allocations in public domains and these allocations require a legal foundation.…”
Section: Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chart 1 reveals, the number of local residents, i.e., the number of the potential speakers of the minority language has declined dramatically since the sixties of the twentieth century. transmission of a language has been repeatedly shown to be extremely difficult to revert (Barreña et al, 2006, Batibo, 2005.…”
Section: What Happened To the Mirandese Speaking Communities? Evaluatmentioning
confidence: 99%