1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-695x(08)60514-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2. Polymer Molecular Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 is defined as the count where 50% of the amylopectin sample was eluted. When the V' instead of V was plotted against log [1]]M, the plot fell on a straight line as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Sample Designation Amylosementioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 is defined as the count where 50% of the amylopectin sample was eluted. When the V' instead of V was plotted against log [1]]M, the plot fell on a straight line as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Sample Designation Amylosementioning
confidence: 93%
“…5 cm 3 ). Table I summarizes the values of M w' [1]] and the peak volume, V. Figure 1 shows the plots of log [1]]M vs. V for all samples. A straight line resulted for all samples except some amylopectin fractions.…”
Section: Sample Designation Amylosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four to five concentrations between 0.05 and 2 wt.% are ordinarily sufficient to identify [ij]. Non-linearities which sometimes occur in the rjsp/c versus c line are discussed in other sources (6). As a rough estimate, when [77] exceeds 0.50 dl/g for an unknown sample, reasonably high MW's are present.…”
Section: Solution Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the current most popular instrumental methods which might, be applied to characterize MWD are reviewed with an emphasis on the physical chemistry of each. The reader interested in more detailed discussions of hardware or in rigor of the theoretical development will find two excellent recent reviews (5,6). Textbooks in polymer science may be helpful in providing alternative fundamental discussion (7,8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%